##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:14137]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3232/2026

Roshani W/o Late Pappu Ram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Poharka, P.s. Rawatsar, Dist Hanumangarh. (At Present Lodged

In Sub Jail Nohar)

----Petitioner Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaidev Singh Bhati Mr. Kirpa Ram.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pawan Bhati, PP.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

25/03/2026 The instant 2^nd application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS

(439 of Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in the present matter. The requisite details of the matter

are tabulated herein below:

The 1^st bail application filed on behalf of petitioner i.e. S.B.

Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.952/2026 was dismissed vide order dated 30.01.2026 passed by this Court with the liberty to the petitioner to file fresh bail application after filing of the

(Uploaded on 25/03/2026 at 05:55:16 PM)

(Downloaded on 04/04/2026 at 01:26:42 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:14137] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3232/2026] challan. After rejection of first bail application, challan has been filed.

Hence, this second application for bail has been filed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is contended that the allegations levelled by the family members regarding an alleged illicit relationship with one Banwari are baseless and on such unfounded allegations, it has been alleged that the husband

of the petitioner committed suicide.

He further submits that the petitioner is a mother of four

children. During the course of investigation, statements were recorded by the Investigating Officer under Section 180 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. In her statement, Monika (Monu), the daughter of the petitioner has stated that there used to be no quarrel between her parents and on the date of the incident, when they woke up, they found the door locked from inside. Thereafter, the villagers broke open the door and the deceased was found hanging from the roof.

It is further contended that there is no material on record to

prima facie establish that the petitioner had in any manner instigated, provoked or pressurized her husband to commit suicide. It is also submitted that no suicide note has been

recovered in the present case.

Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in

judicial custody since 21.12.2025, the charge-sheet has already been filed, and the trial is likely to take a considerable period of time. Therefore, considering the responsibility of the petitioner

(Uploaded on 25/03/2026 at 05:55:16 PM)

(Downloaded on 04/04/2026 at 01:26:42 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:14137] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3232/2026] towards her minor children, it is prayed that the benefit of bail

may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently

opposed the bail application and submitted that as per the prosecution case and conclusion of the investigation, the petitioner was having an illicit relationship with another person, on account

of which her husband committed suicide.

Having heard and considered the rival submissions, facts and

circumstances of the case as well as perused the material available on record; considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed and the petitioner is in custody since 21.12.2025 and the trial will take sufficiently long time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of

the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Consequently, the 2^nd bail application under Section 483 of

BNSS (439 of Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused- petitioner