SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 10165

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
Anand Sharma, J
Roshni Chamar – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1517/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Laxmi Kant Malpura
For the Respondents: Kartikeya Sharma

A candidate cannot seek a change in their reserved category after participating in the selection process, especially when documented opportunities for rectification provided by the conducting body were neglected by the candidate.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment - Category change - Petition to change category from 'SC WE (Unmarried)' to 'SC WE DV' after declaration of result - Petitioner had multiple opportunities to correct application as per advertisement but failed to do so - Held, category change cannot be allowed at a belated stage after declaration of results - Writ petition dismissed. (Paras 8, 9, 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner participated in the recruitment for Class-IV employees. Due to errors by a third-party service provider during online application, her category was recorded incorrectly. Despite passing the written examination, the petitioner did not raise the error during the rectification window provided by the Board post-examination. She sought judicial intervention only after the result was declared and she failed to secure a high merit position.

Findings of Court:
Court observed that the advertisement provided two specific windows for correction: one within seven days of the application deadline and another after the examination. The petitioner missed both opportunities and appeared for the exam under the incorrect category, thus precluding her claim for rectification at the result stage.

Issues: Whether a candidate, who participated in a selection process under an incorrectly self-declared category despite available opportunities for rectification, is entitled to have that category changed after the final results are declared.

Ratio Decidendi: Following established legal doctrine, a candidate cannot be permitted to amend their reserved category once they have fully participated in the selection process, as such changes would disrupt the integrity of the recruitment and merit list.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges denial of category correction post-result. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. rectification procedures provided by the board were ignored. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. category change prohibited after process participation and result. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

Order

1. The above writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the denial of correction in her category in the recruitment process for the post of Class-IV employees.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner participated in the direct recruitment process for the post of Class-IV employee initiated by Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur.

3. It is stated that the petitioner belongs to 'SC WE DV' category. On account of the fact that the petitioner is less educated and has no knowledge with regard to computer or the process of filing the online application form, she got her form filled through third person/E-Mitra, who instead of showing the category of petitioner as 'SC WE DV', showed the petitioner as 'SC WE (Unmarried)'.

4. It is also submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after filing the application form, the petitioner participated in the written examination and although, she secured more marks than the cut-off marks declared for 'SC WE DV' candidate, yet only on account of human error occurred while submitting the application form, the petitioner was not considered in the category of 'SC WE DV'.

5. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after declaration of result, petitioner also verbally requested for correction in her category, yet no action was taken by the respondent-Board. It is also submitted that, in case, the petitioner was treated in the category of 'SC WE DV', then she would have secured proper place in the merit list for further consideration in the recruitment process.

6. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

7. Clause 17 of the advertisement issued by respondent Board is reproduced hereunder:

“17. vkWuykbZu vkosnu esa la'kks/ku dh izfØ;k%& cksMZ }kjk vkWuykbZu vkosnu esa la'kk s/ku gsrq dk sbZ vkWQykbZu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj ugha fd;k tk; sxkA cksMZ }kjk tkjh foKfIr fnukad 14-07-2023 } kjk ;fn fdlh vH;FkhZ dks vius OTR es a Lo; a ds uke] firk ds uke] tUefrfFk ,oa fyax esa ifjorZu djuk gS rks mls loZizFke vius vk/kkj@tuvk/kkj es a ifjorZu djokuk gksxk rRi'pkr~ OTR LØhu ij Q sp dk cVu nckuk gksxk ftll s vk/kkj@tuvk/kkj esa ntZ uohu MkVk mlds OTR esa Lor% gh vk tk; sxkA vH;FkhZ dksa vius OTR es a vkj{k.k J s.kh] fnO;kaxtu J s.kh ,oa ewy fuokl esa okafNr la'kks/ku djus dh vuqefr nh xbZ gSA vH;FkhZ la'kks/ku djus ds mijkUr gh vkWuykbZu vko snu HkjsaA ;fn vH;FkhZ HkrhZ dk vkWuykbZu vkosnu lcfeV dj pqdk gS rks , slh fLFkfr esa vkWuykbZu vko snu esa la'kks/ku djus dh vof/k ds nkSjku Hkh mls Lo; a ds uke] firk ds uke] tUefrfFk ,oa fyax esa ifjorZu dh vuqefr ugha gksxhA vH;FkhZ dks ;fn vkj{k.k J s.kh@fnO;kaxtu J s.kh@ewy fuokl esa la'kks/ku djus gS rks igys mls OTR i st ij vkj{k.k J s.kh@fnO;kaxtu J s.kh@e wy fuokl esa la'kks/ku djuk gksxk bll s mls Lo; a d s vkWuykbZu vkosnu esa iwoZ es a Hkjs x; s vkj{k.k J s.kh@fnO;kaxtu J s.kh@e wy fuokl esa la'kks/ku djus dk fodYi miyC/k gks tk; sxk] ftls mi;ksx esa ysdj og okafNr la'kks/ku dj ldrk gSA vkWuykbZu vkosnu Submit fd; s tkus ds i'pkr~ ;fn vkosnd dk s fdlh izdkj dh =qfV dk irk yxrk gS rks vH;FkhZ vkWuykbZu vko snu esa QksVk s] gLrk{kj ,oa mu lwpukvksa dks ifjofrZr ugha dj ik,xk tks mlus OTR ds le; ntZ dh gS A 'ks"k lwpukvksa es a og la'kks/ku fuEukuqlkj dj ldrk gS%&

i. ;fn dksbZ vH;FkhZ vius vkWuykbZu vko snu esa la'kk s/ku djkuk pkgrk gS rks vkosnu izkfIr dh v afre fnukad ds i'pkr~ 07 fnol ds Hkhrj fu/kkZfjr 'kqYd 300@& :i; s nsdj vkWuykbZu vkosnu esa la'kks/ku dj ldrk gSA vkWuykbZu vkosnu esa vH;FkhZ QksVk s] gLrk{kj ,oa mu lwpukvksa dk s ifjofrZr ugha dj ik,xk tk s mlus OTR ds le; ntZ dh gS ;Fkk uke] firk dk uke] tUefrfFk] fyax bR;kfnA 'ks"k izfof'kf"V;ks a esa la'kk s/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top