##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:15293]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Misc. Interim Bail Application No. 14141/2025 Girdhariram S/o Shri Lalaram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bhojasar, Police Station Baytu, District Barmer. (Presently

Confined At Dist. Jail, Pratapgarh)

----Petitioner Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Gaur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sameer Pareek, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Order

02/04/2026

1. Instant interim bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant-accused for releasing him on interim bail for a period of one month on ground of ailment of his wife, namely, Smt. Shanti Devi. The applicant-accused is being tried for an offence punishable under Sections 8/15, 18, 25, 29 of NDPS Act lodged in connection with an F.I.R. No. 93/2023, PS Chhoti Sadri, District

Pratapgarh.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant-accused contends that his wife is suffering from Adenomyosis with DUB, for which the doctor has advised an operation. Being a husband, applicant-accused is required to stay with his wife at the time of surgery. He has invited attention of the Court towards various medical record of wife of the applicant-accused. A certificate issued by the Gram Panchayat, Bhojasar has also been submitted. He further submits that the applicant-accused is the only competent member in his family to attend to his wife, who is in need of constant medical attention and care. It is, therefore,

(Uploaded on 04/04/2026 at 02:30:58 PM)

(Downloaded on 06/04/2026 at 07:39:43 AM)

[2026:RJ-JD:15293] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14141/2025] prayed that the petitioner be released on interim bail for a period

of 30 days.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the interim bail application asserting that there is a possibility that the petitioner may flee and abscond if interim bail is granted to him. He thus, prayed that having regard to the gravity of offences alleged against the applicant-accused, the interim bail application

be rejected.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, as well as the fact that the applicant’s wife is suffering from adenomyosis with DUB, as reflected in the report dated 27.03.2026 submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor received from the office of the SHO, Police Station Chotti Sadri, District Pratapgarh, along with the medical documents, it appears that the applicant’s wife is in need of medical attention and care. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant interim bail to the applicant-

accused for a period of 21 days.

5. Accordingly, interim bail application filed under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that applicant-accused - Girdhariram S/o Shri Lalaram, arrested in connection with the above mentioned FIR, shall be released on interim bail for a period of 21 days, subject to the condition that the applicant-accused shall deposit Rs. 1,00,000/- (One Lakh Only) before the learned Trial Court and furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (out of which one surety will be of a close relative of

(Uploaded on 04/04/2026 at 02:30:58 PM)

(Downloaded on 06/04/2026 at 07:39:43 AM)

[2026:RJ-JD:15293] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14141/2025] the applicant-accused) each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court for his surrender on completion of 21 days from the date of

actual release.

6. If the applicant-accused surrenders within the stipulated period before the concerned Jail, the amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- so deposited before the Trial Court concerned shall be refunded back to him whereas, if the applicant-accused fails to surrender within the stipulated period, then amount so deposited shall be forfeited

immediately.

7. Let this bail application be again listed on 24.04