SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 10316

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
UMA SHANKER VYAS
NADAN SINGH SON OF GIRRAJ – Appellant
Versus
GIRRAJJI WIFE OF RAMKISHORE – Respondent
CMA / 784 / 2026



[2026:RJ-JP:11734]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 784/2026

1. Nadan Singh, Son Of Girraj, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Badawajidpur, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan.

2. Vikram Son Of Nadan Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Badawajidpur, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan.

3. Shivraj, Son Of Ramswaroop, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Badawajidpur, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan.

4. Ramswaroop, Son Of Girraj, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Badawajidpur, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan.

----Appellants Versus

1. Girraji, Wife Of Ramkishore, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Badawajidpur, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan.

2. Balveer, Son Of Ramkishore, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Badawajidpur, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan.

3. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, District Karauli.

4. Tehsildar, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli.

----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv.

Mr. Rahul Sharma, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

Judgment / Order

19/03/2026

1- vihykFkhZx.k&izfroknhx.k ¼vkxs ^^izfroknhx.k^^ dgk tkosxk½ }kjk ;g nhokuh fofo/k vihy vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k dze&1] fg.MkSuflVh] ftyk&djkSyh }kjk fu;fer nhokuh vihy la[;k 33@2025 esaikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 26-11-2025 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS] ftlds ek/;e ls fo}ku izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; fnukad 30-10-2025 dks vikLr djrs gq, {ks=kf/kdkj ds fcUnq ij fook|d fojfpr djrs gq, lk{; ys[kc) djus ds mijkUr fookn fuLrkj.k djus dk funsZ'k nsrs gq, ekeyk izfrizsf"kr fd;kA

2- fo}ku vf/koDrk izfroknhx.k rFkk izR;FkhZx.k&oknh dh cgl lquh x;h] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

3- oknhx.k tks fj'rs esa ekrk rFkk iq= gSa] }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; flfoy U;k;k/kh'k] uknkSrh esa vkns'kkRed LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk dk okn izLrqr dj ;g vfHkdfFkr fd;k fd oknhx.k ds dCts o vf/kdkjksa dh lEifRr [kljk uEcj 809 jdck 0-35 gDs Vs;j xzke ckMk+ okthniqj rglhy&uknkSrh ftyk&xaxkiqj flVh esa fLFkr gS vkSj blh vuqlkj jktLo fjdkWMZ esa Hkh bldk banzkt gSA izfroknhx.k }kjk mudh bl Hkwfe esa vfrdze.k vkSj gLr{ksi fd;s tkus ij LFkk;h o vkKkid fu"ks/kkKk pkgh] ftl ij izfroknhx.k dh vksj ls vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr vkosnu izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k fd ekeyk d`f"k Hkwfe ls lacaf/kr gS] LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk ds lca a/k esa ek= jktLo U;k;ky; gh izdj.k dh lquokbZ djus gsrq l{ke gS] flfoy U;k;ky; dk {ks=kf/kdkj oftZr gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk izfroknhx.k ds vkosnu vUrxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- dks Lohdkj dj oknhx.k dk okn vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr ukeatwj fd;k x;k] ijUrq vihyk/khu vkns'k ds ek/;e ls fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k fd d`f"k Hkwfe dk mi;ksx vkoklh; iz;kstu ls gks jgk gS ;k ugha] ;g fcUnq rF;ksa o fof/k dk fefJr iz'u gS] vr% bl ij lk{; ys[kc) djus ds mijkUr fu.kZ; ikfjr djsaA

4- fo}ku vf/koDrk izfroknhx.k dk fuosnu gS fd Lo;a oknh ds vfHkdFkuksa] layXu nLrkostksa ds vuqlkj oknxzLr Hkwfe dk d`f"k Hkwfe gksuk izekf.kr gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls vkxs ^^vf/kfu;e&1955^^ dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 207 ds vuqlkj ekeyk jktLo U;k;ky; }kjk lquokbZ ;ksX; gS] flfoy U;k;ky; dk {ks=kf/kdkj oftZr gSA tcfd fo}ku vf/koDrk oknh i{k dk fuosnu gS fd ekSds ij mijksDr d`f"k Hkfe ij vkoklh; fuekZ.k gks j[kk gS] dksbZ dk'r ugha gks jgh gS] vr% miHkksx ds vk/kkj ij ;g vkoklh; Hkwfe gS] bls d`f"k Hkwfe ugh ekuk tk ldrkA fodYi esa ;g Hkh fuosnu fd;k fd ;g fcUnq rF; o fof/k dk fefJr iz'u gS] vr% lk{; ds mijkUr gh fu.khZr gks ldrk gS] vUr esa vihyk/khu vkns'k fnukafdr 26-11-2025 dks fof/k&lEer gksuk crkrs gq, ;g vihy [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

5- ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Eldeco Housing and Indurstries Ltd. Vs. Ashok Vidyarthi and Ors. 2023 INSC ,oa

1043 Soumitra Kumar Sen Vs. Shyamlal Kumar Sen &

esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd vkns'k Ors. 2018 DNJ (SC) 769

7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds vkosnu ij fopkj djrs le; ek= oknh ds vfHkdFkuksa o okni= ds lkFk izLrqr nLrkostksa ij gh fopkj fd;k tk ldrk gSA orZeku ekeys esa ;g fufo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top