SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 10405

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
BHAWANI SHANKAR PUROHIT S/O SHRI JHUMAR MAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


[2026:RJ-JP:9845]

tHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 304/2025 Bhawani Shankar Purohit S/o Shri Jhumar Mal, R/o G-123, Modi Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor.

2. Sheetal Jajam S/o Late Shri Manaram Saini, R/o F-9, 10, Modi Nagar, Purani Chungi, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, presently Resident of F-60, Modi Nagar, Purani Chungi, Ajmer Road, Jaipur.

3. Banwair Lal Jajam S/o Late Shri Manaram Saini, R/o F-59, Modi Nagar, Purani Chungi, Ajmer Road, Jaipur.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP with Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

Order

07/03/2026

1. In “Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal versus Union of India and Anr.” reported in 2003 (2) SCC 45, Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that lawyers have no right to go on strike or to give a call for boycott of Courts. Calls given by Bar Association or Bar Council for such purpose cannot require the Court to adjourn the matters. In the case of “Krishnakant Tamrakar versus the State of Madhya Pradesh” reported in (2018) 17 SCC 27, it has been held that strike b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top