[2026:RJ-JP:8652]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8998/2019 Virendra Kumar S/o Shri Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Post Goth, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjunu, Ra-

jasthan, Pin 333516.

----Petitioner Versus

1 State Of Rajasthan, Through The Home Secretary, De-

partment Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

2 The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Ra-

jasthan, Jaipur

3 Superintendent Of Police, District Chittorgarh, Chittor-

garh.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad with Mr. Mohsin Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Soumitra Chaturvedi, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

Order

25/02/2026

1. Instant Writ petition has been filed by petitioner with follow-

ing prayer:-

1. That impugned order dated 11.03.2019 (An-

nexure- 7) by which the candidature of the petitioner has been cancelled may kindly be quashed, in the in-

terest of justice.

2. That the respondents may be directed that the petitioner may be considered eligible for appoint- ment to the post of Constable Recruitment as per his merit and the order dated 11.03.2019 may be directed to not come in the way of petitioner for appointment.

3. That the action of the respondents in de-

priving the petitioner from appointment to the post of constable on grounds of criminal case may kindly be held illegal and arbitrary and he may be given ap- pointment on the post of constable as per his merit with all consequential benefits. 4. Any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the controversy raised herein is no more res integra as same has been decided by the Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court in case of Babbal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 971/2022), and further followed by another Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court in case of Jaipal Chalka Vs. State of Ra- jasthan & Ors. (D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 610/2022), or- der dated 09.10.2025. He further submits that this matter be disposed of in accordance with ratio laid down by Hon’ble Division Bench in case of Babbal Singh (supra) and Jaipal Chalka (supra).

3. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent(s) and he submitted that the case of the petitioner was considered by the respondent on the basis of the circular dated 28.03.2017 issued by the DGP, the candidature of the petitioner was rejected and now he is not enti-

tled to be reconsidered.

4. Heard Learned Counsel for the parties and perused the ma-

terial placed on record.

5. The petitioner has filed an application pursuant to an adver- tisement for recruitment on the post of Constable under the Ra- jasthan Police Subordinate Services Rules, 1989. The petitioner was duly qualified after the written examination and Physical Standard Test/Physical Efficiency Test in the OBC Male Category. The petitioner has also submitted that an FIR was registered at Police Station Ashok Nagar on 25.11.2014 wherein a charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner and others.

6. Admittedly, the petitioner was not appointed on the post of Constable as FIR No. 463/2014 under Sections 143, 323 and 327 IPC was registered at Police Station Ashok Nagar, Jaipur (South) on 25.11.2014 wherein a charge sheet has been filed against seven persons including the present petitioner under Sections

143, 323, 327 and 149 IPC.

7. The material on record as examined by the respondents indi- cate that the petitioner was acquitted on 22.06.2015 after extend- ing benefit of doubt to him. The material on record also indicate that a compromise has been filed by the victims. The Department has relied on circular dated 15.07.2016 issued by DOP for charac- ter verification at the time of appointment. This circular has also laid down certain grounds whereby the appointment of a candi- date can be denied in case of