SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 10499

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
UMA SHANKER VYAS, J
Banshi Lal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Ramavatar Sharma – Respondent
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3523/2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. M.C. Gupta, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ram Rakh Sharma, Adv.

Judgment / Order

30/03/2026

1- vihykFkhZ&oknh ¼vkxs ^^oknh^^ dgk tkosxk½ }kjk ;g nhokuh fofo/k vihy fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k cLlh] t;iqj egkuxj&izFke }kjk fu;fer nhokuh okn la[;k 10@2023 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 11-09-2023 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS] ftlds ek/;e ls oknh dk okn flfoy U;k;ky; ds {ks=kf/kdkj dk ugha gksuk ekurs gq, l{ke U;k;ky; esa izLrqr

djus gsrq vkns'k 7 fu;e 10 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr ykSVk;k x;kA

2- fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ rFkk izR;FkhZ i{k dh cgl lquh x;h]

vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

3- fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk fuosnu gS fd okLro esa bl ekeys esa izfroknh dh vksj ls /kkjk 10 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr vkosnu izLrqr fd;k Fkk]

(Uploaded on 04/04/2026 at 01:11:44 PM)

(Downloaded on 07/04/2026 at 09:46:47 PM)

[2026:RJ-JP:13376] (2 of 7) [CMA-3523/2023] vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr dksbZ vkosnu is'k ugha fd;k x;k vkSj fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk Lor% gh vkns'k 7 fu;e 10 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr okn ykSVk;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k gS] ftl ij oknh dks lquokbZ dk i;kZIr volj ugha feykA ;g Hkh fuosnu fd;k fd d`f"k Hkwfe ij cus vkoklksa ds laca/k esa caVokjs ds vuqrks"k ds fy, flfoy U;k;ky; gh l{ke

gSA

4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izfroknh&izR;FkhZx.k dk fuosnu gS fd d`f"k Hkwfe vkSj mlesa cus edkuksa ds laca/k esa caVokjs grs q okn izLrqr fd;k x;k gS tks fd /kkjk 207 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼vkxs ^^vf/kfu;e&1955^^ dgk tkosxk½ ds rgr jktLo U;k;ky; ds {ks=kf/kdkj dk gSA bl izdkj vihyk/khu vkns'k fof/k&lEer gksuk crkrs gq, ;g vihy

[kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

5- tgka rd U;k;ky; }kjk Loizsj.kk ls okn ykSVk;s tkus dk iz'u gS] /kkjk&10 lh-ih-lh- ds vkosnu ds ek/;e ls izfroknh i{k }kjk ;g vkifRr yh x;h Fkh fd orZeku d`f"k Hkwfe ds laca/k esa jktLo U;k;ky; esa okn yafcr gS vkSj flfoy U;k;ky; dh dk;Zokgh dks LFkfxr j[ks tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA mDr vkosnu dh lquokbZ ds nkSjku U;k;ky; }kjk ;g ik;k fd ekeyk d`f"k Hkwfe ds foHkktu ds laca/k esa gS] vr% lquokbZ dk {ks=kf/kdkj flfoy U;k;ky; dks ugha gS vkSj mlds vk/kkj ij l{ke U;k;ky; esa okn izLrqr djus grs q ykSVk;k x;kA bl fcUnq ij U;k;ky; }kjk nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;k gSA okn ykSVk;s tkus grs q vkosnu izLrqr gksuk vko';d ugha gS] U;k;ky; Loizsj.kk ls vkns'k ikfjr djus gsrq l{ke gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa

bl izkjfEHkd vkifRr dks vLohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

6- bl izdj.k esa ;g fooknjfgr fLFkfr gS fd d`f"k Hkwfe [kljk uEcj 362 vkSj mlesa cus gq, edkuksa ds foHkktu ds laca/k esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa okn izLrqr fd;k x;k FkkA ^^vf/kfu;e&1955^^ dh /kkjk 5¼24½ ds vuqlkj d`f"k Hkwfe ij cus iDds fuekZ.k Hkh d`f"k Hkwfe esa lekfgr gSaA d`f"k

(Uploaded on 04/04/2026 at 01:11:44 PM)

(Downloaded on 07/04/2026 at 09:46:47 PM)

[2026:RJ-JP:13376] (3 of 7) [CMA-3523/2023] Hkwfe dks xSj d`f"k iz;kstukFkZ Hkw&ifjroZu djokdj fuekZ.k djok;k x;k

gks] ,slh fLFkfr ugha gSA

7- blh U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk fu.kZ;

Lal Singh Jhala Vs.

ds ekeys esa jktLFkku Panna Lal 2016(0) Supreme (Raj.) 905 Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼ftls vkxs ^^vf/kfu;e&1956^^ dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 103] vf/kfu;e&1955 dh /kkjk 5¼24½ rFkk vU; lqlaxr izko/kkuksa ij

fopkj djus ds mijkUr fuEukuqlkj O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS&

"A bare look at the above two definitions, which have been indicated in two provisions relating to the Acts which deals with the land and abadi land, clearly reveals that till such time that the 'land' is not converted into 'abadi land', the same continuous to be land i.e. agriculture land with consequences as

provided under both the Acts.

...................it is well settled that pertaining to an unconverted agriculture land, the suit would lie before the Revenue Court only and the Civil Court's jurisdiction would be barred under the provisions of

section 207 of the Tenancy Act."

8- bl U;k;ky; }kjk Rama Kant Khetan Vs. Sri Ram Het Gupta &

ds ekeys esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr Ors. 1985 RLR 281 fd;k x;k gS fd tc rd d`f"k Hkwfe dk Hkw&mi;ksx ifjorZu ugha gksrk gS

rc rd mldh izd`fr d`f"k Hkwfe gh jgsxhA

9- vU; U;kf;d n`"VkUr Jannat Firdosh And Anr. Vs. Alfu & Ors. ds ekeys esa d`f"k Hkwfe ds laca/k esa vkns'k 7

2008(1) WLN 374 (Raj.)

fu;e 11 lh-ih-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top