SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 10634

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
GULAM ABBAS SHAUKAT ALI SHEKH S/O SHAUKAT ALI SHEKH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 4817 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:13349]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4817/2026

Gulam Abbas Shaukat Ali Shekh S/o Shaukat Ali Shekh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Jakir Hussain Ch. L Pankheshah Baba Dargah, Lbs Marg, Ghatkopar (W) Greater Mumbai, At Present Room No. 05, Mulla Abdul Khalid Ch. L, Behind Pankheshah Baba Dargah, Lbs Marg, Ghatkopar, Police Station Vikrauli Park Side,

Greater Mumbai (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

----Petitioner Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Swati Sharma for Mr. Girish Khandelwal

For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

Order

30/03/2026

1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.412/2025 registered at Police Station Vidyadhar Nagar, District Jaipur City (North) for offence punishable under Section 318(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, 'BNS'), 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under

Sections 332(c) & 305(a) of BNS.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel contends that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is

(Uploaded on 08/04/2026 at 04:03:00 PM)

(Downloaded on 11/04/2026 at 05:50:32 PM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JP:13349] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4817/2026] contended that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2026 and further custody of the petitioner

would not serve any fruitful purpose.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is habitual offender as nine other cases have been registered against the petitioner out of which, one case is

registered for the offence under Section 420 IPC.

4. Heard. Perused the material available on record.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also considering the nature of evidence available in charge-sheet and the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of this case, I

deem it proper to allow the bail application.

6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Gulam Abbas Shaukat Ali Shekh S/o Shaukat Ali Shekh, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand Only) (out of which, one must be given by his family member) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter

(Uploaded on 08/04/2026 at 04:03:00 PM)

(Downloaded on 11/04/2026 at 05:50:32 PM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JP:13349] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4817/2026] is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when

called upon to do so.

7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence once in every two months in the concerned

police station, till trial is concluded.

8. Concerned SHO shall enter attendance of the petitioner in the Roznamcha. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this

regard.

9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top