SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 10635

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
SHOBHAGMAL NAGAR S/O SHANKARLAL NAGAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 4818 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:13355]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4818/2026

Shobhagmal Nagar S/o Shankarlal Nagar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Lalganj, Tehsil Nainwa, Police Station Nainwa, District Budni Rajasthan Presently R/o F-19 Balaji Vihar, Vatika Road, Jaipur, Police Station Sanganer, Jaipur Rajasthan (At Present Accused

Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

----Petitioner Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kumar Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

Order

30/03/2026

1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.13/2026 registered at Police Station Banipark, District Jaipur (West) for offences punishable under Sections 305(e), 62, 332(c), 115(2), 326(b) & 307 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, 'BNS'), 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 332(c), 62, 115(2), 307,

117(2), 126(2) & 305(e) of BNS.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel contends that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is contended that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time

(Uploaded on 08/04/2026 at 04:02:27 PM)

(Downloaded on 11/04/2026 at 05:50:46 PM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JP:13355] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4818/2026] in its conclusion. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 16.01.2026 and further custody of the petitioner

would not serve any fruitful purpose.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is habitual offender as eight other cases have been registered against him and there is allegation against him that he

tried to commit theft on the ATM machine.

4. Heard. Perused the material available on record.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also considering the nature of evidence available in charge-sheet and the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of this case, I

deem it proper to allow the bail application.

6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Shobhagmal Nagar S/o Shankarlal Nagar, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Fifty Thousand Only) (out of which, one must be given by his family member) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all

(Uploaded on 08/04/2026 at 04:02:27 PM)

(Downloaded on 11/04/2026 at 05:50:46 PM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JP:13355] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4818/2026] subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do

so.

7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in the first week of every month in the

concerned police station, till trial is concluded.

8. Concerned SHO shall enter attendance of the petitioner in the Roznamcha. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this

regard.

9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial

Court to cancel the bail granted to him b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top