SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 10651

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ANAND SHARMA
SULOCHANA KUMARI W/O SUBASH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 5672 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:13428]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5672/2026 Sulochana Kumari W/o Subash Chandra, Aged About 43 Years, R/o

Kailash Nagar, Piprali Road, Nawalgarh Road, Sikar, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat Jaipur.

2. The Director Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

3. Raj Sharma, Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School Gokulpura (213394), Sikar.

----Respondents

For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Ojla Advocate.

For Respondents : Ms. Pooja Sharma Advocate on behalf of Mr. Manoj Sharma Additional

Advocate General.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA

Judgment

30/03/2026

1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition with following

prayer:-

"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may most graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and by way of writ order or direction in nature thereof the impugned transfer order dated 22-09-2025 and 09-01-2025 passed by the respondents and order dated 17-03- 2026 passed by the learned Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur may kindly be quashed and set aside by your lordship and respondent is directed to continue the petitioner as Govt. Senior secondary

School Gokulpra, Sikar.

Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Tribunal may deems just and proper in the facts and

circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner."

(Uploaded on 10/04/2026 at 12:01:25 PM)

(Downloaded on 11/04/2026 at 06:05:29 PM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JP:13428] (2 of 6) [CW-5672/2026] 2. It is stated that the petitioner is holding the post of Principal, Senior Secondary School. Vide order dated 22.09.2025 passed by Director, Secondary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner, the petitioner was transferred from Government Senior Secondary School, Gokulpura, Sikar to Government Senior Secondary School,

Khariya, District Churu.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that feeling aggrieved by order dated 22.09.2025, the petitioner filed S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16787/2025 before this Court, which was disposed of vide order dated 04.11.2025 after recording the submission of the petitioner that her husband is also a Government Servant and is posted in District Sikar, therefore, instead of deciding the writ petition on merits, Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.11.2025 granted liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation to the respondent-authority raising all grounds and respondent-authorities were directed to decide the representation within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. It was also directed in order dated 04.11.2025 that in the meanwhile and till disposal of the representation, operation of transfer

order/relieve order shall remain stayed.

4. It is stated that in compliance of order dated 04.11.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 02.12.2025 before the Director, Secondary Education raising her grievances against the transfer order. However, the representation was rejected vide order dated

09.01.2026 by giving irrational findings.

5. Learned counsel submits that under these circumstances, against order of rejection of representation dated 09.01.2026, the petitioner approached Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal,

(Uploaded on 10/04/2026 at 12:01:25 PM)

(Downloaded on 11/04/2026 at 06:05:29 PM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JP:13428] (3 of 6) [CW-5672/2026] Jaipur by way of filing appeal No.780/2026. In that appeal after filing reply by the respondent-department final order was passed on 17.03.2026 by the Tribunal for rejecting the appeal filed by the

petitioner-appellant.

6. Learned counsel submits that order dated 17.03.2026 passed by the Tribunal suffers from jurisdictional error and material illegality. Learned counsel submits that a finding has been given by the Tribunal that grievance of the petitioner against the transfe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top