##PAGE1##

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5863/2024

Kanha Hotels And Spa Pvt. Ltd.

----Petitioner Versus

Union Of India ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. B. Mathur, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Daksh Pareek Mr. Falak Mathur

Mr. Manish Mr. Yug Singh

Mr. Utsav Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. C. S. Sinha with

Mr. Mayank Kamwar Ms. Anima Chatuvedi for ASG

Mr. B. S. Chhaba, AAG Mr. Amit Kuri

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

06/04/2026

As substantial arguments are heard, the instant matter is

marked as part heard and the same is admitted.

The present writ petition has been filed invoking the

extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, assailing the impugned order dated 28.02.2024 passed by the Standing Committee of the Wildlife

Department.

In the instant matter, it is contended by the learned Senior

Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner-entity is operating as a 5-star hotel facility under the name and style of Kanha Hotel and Spa Pvt. Ltd. It is further submitted that the petitioner has

(Uploaded on 10/04/2026 at 10:42:36 AM)

(Downloaded on 11/04/2026 at 08:26:08 PM)

(2 of 3) [CW-5863/2024]

entered into a commercial collaboration with the internationally

recognized brand, Taj Hotels.

It is submitted that during the period from 2007 to 2019, the

petitioner diligently sought and procured all requisite statutory permissions and No Objection Certificates (NOCs) from various instrumentalities of the State, including the Pollution Control Board, Jaipur Development Authority (JDA), Fire Department,

Forest Department, Wildlife Department, and the Nagar Nigam.

Learned counsel emphasizes that, relying upon the aforesaid

approvals from the State authorities, the petitioner has secured a substantial financial loan to the tune of approximately Rs. 100 crores, in addition to its own significant capital investment. It is next submitted that as on date, the commercial facility allegedly generates a net turnover of approximately Rs. 150 crores and

provides direct employment to nearly 350 employees.

The gravamen of the petitioner’s submission is directed

against the impugned order dated 28.02.2024. Learned counsel argued that the said order suffers from material perversity and has been passed in an arbitrary and hostile manner against the petitioner. It is contended that the respondent-authorities are barred by the doctrine of promissory estoppel from taking a contradictory stand, as the impugned action seeks to arbitrarily reverse their own previous decisions and approvals that were

granted in favor of the petitioner.

In support of these contentions, reliance has been placed

upon the notification dated 08.03.2019, which delineates the Zonal Masterplan of the new unit. Learned counsel has further relied upon an inspection report prepared by the Wildlife

(Uploaded on 10/04/2026 at 10:42:36 AM)

(Downloaded on 11/04/2026 at 08:26:08 PM)

(3 of 3) [CW-5863/2024]

Department subsequent to the year 2019, pursuant to which a No Objection Certificate (NOC) was issued by the State authority. In light of the above submissions, it is prayed that the impugned

order dated 28.02.2024 be quashed and set aside.

Per contra, Mr. Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of

the respondent-Union of India, while admitting the existence of the documents produced by the petitioner, vehemently opposed the present petition. It is submitted that the commercial operations of the said facility have not yet commenced. To substantiate this claim, reliance was placed upon photographic evidence produced by the petitioner itself which were extracted from Google depicting the status of the property in the year 2022, as well as the official note-sheets of the JDA dated 21.09.2022. Learned counsel submitted that while the primary construction has commenced, the finishing work remains pending and therefore the commercial operation of the hotel has not begun as alleged by the

learned counsel for t