SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 10838

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Munnuri Laxman, J
Sukhram – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents: Sachin Acharya

Judgment

DATE OF CONCLUSION OF ARGUMENTS : 08/01/2026

DATE ON WHICH ORDER IS RESERVED : 08/01/2026

FULL ORDER OR OPERATIVE PART : FULL ORDER

DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 07/04/2026

1) The present writ petitions, being Petition Nos. 1548/2001 and 3854/2000, challenge the common order dated 03.10.2000 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Bikaner in Revision Case Nos. 3/1999 and 4/1999, whereby Revision Case No. 3/1999 was dismissed and Revision Case No. 4/1999 was allowed. Consequently, the order dated 31.05.1999 passed by the District Magistrate-cum-Settlement Commissioner, Nagaur, and the order dated 15.06.1972 passed by the Managing Officer, Nagaur, were set aside.

2) The issue involved in both the writ petitions is one and the same. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are being decided by this common order. The Writ Petition No.148/2001 has been filed by Sukhram, the purchaser of a part of the subject property involved in the present litigation. He purchased the land from Tulsiram by way of a registered sale deed. Tulsiram, in turn, had purchased the said land from Kalu Khan on the strength of a Sanad issued by the Managing Officer under the Displaced Persons (Compensa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top