HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MANEESH SHARMA
GHISULAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 3875 / 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:16652]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3875/2026 Ghisulal S/o Bhuraram, Aged About 70 Years, R/o 423 Bajrang Nagar, P.S. Transport Nagar, Pali, Raj. (Presently Lodged At District Jail, Pali.)
----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Maru Mr. Mudit Vaishnav Mr. Irfan Bhati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP Mr. Bhoop Singh Choudhary, for complainant.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order
09/04/2026
1. The present bail application has been preferred under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of the petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:
S.No.
Particulars of the case
1.
FIR Number
58/2026
2.
Concerned Police Station
Kotwali Pali
3.
District
Pali
4.
Offences alleged in the FIR
193, 196, 199, 200, 204, 420, 463, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474 & 120-B of IPC, 1860.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case and has not committed any offence as narrated in the FIR. He further submits that the petitioner is a 70 years old person and suffering from age related ailments. He further submits that a detailed inquiry has been conducted with regard to the averements of the FIR by the Inquiry Officer i.e. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pali and the allegation of tampering with the judicial record has not been proved. He lastly submits that the petitioner is in custody since 16.03.2026 and there is high probability that the trial of the case will take considerable time to conclude; he therefore prays that the bail application of the petitioner may kindly be allowed and the petitioner may kindly be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposes the bail application and prays for dismissal of the same.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the facts of the case more particularly that the petitioner is a 70 years old person, suffering from various old age related ailments; the petitioner is in judicial custody since 16.03.2026; and that the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused on bail.
6. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S., 2023 is allowed and it is ordered that the accused- petitioner Ghisulal S/o Bhuraram, shall be enlarged on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The petitioner shall also not tamper with any evidence nor would he directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer.
8. It is made it clear that the observations made hereinabove are only for deciding the present bail application without commenting on the merits/de-merits of the case, and shall not influence the trial of the case in any manner.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J
42-Ishan/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.