SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 73

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR


D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 169/2025


The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer.


----Appellant


Versus


1. Lavanshu Sankhla S/o Pushpendra, Aged About 23 Years, Inside Nagori Gate, Vijay Chowk, Sakhla Bhawan, Jodhpur, (Rajasthan).


2. The Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.


3. The Director Of Prosecution, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.


----Respondents


Connected With


D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 130/2025


The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer.


----Appellant


Versus


1. Kumkum Jodha D/o Laxman Singh Jodha, Aged About 23 Years, Sajjan Magan, 215, Hanwant B Street No 19, B.j.s. Colony, Jodhpur, (Rajasthan).


2. The Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.


3. The Director Of Prosecution, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.


----Respondents


D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 135/2025


Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary.


----Appellant


Versus


1. Mansi Vyas D/o Vijay Shankar Vyas, Aged About 23 Years, Brahmpuri Chowk Mohallah, Choongrah, Near Laxmninath Bhandar, Bikaner, Rajasthan.


2. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional ChiefSecretary, Department Of Prosecution, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Raj.


3. Home Department, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.


----Respondents


D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 244/2025


1. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Chairman, Ajmer.


2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer.


----Appellants


Versus


Shivangi Pathalk D/o Tej Prakash Pathak, Aged About 22 Years, D-226 Sushant City, Pali Road, Jodhpur.


----Respondent


D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 279/2025


1. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Chairman, Ajmer.


2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer.


----Appellants


Versus


1. Rohit Prajapati S/o Bal Krishana Prajapati, Aged About 22 Years, R/o 58-A, Ladha Colony, Ratanada, Jodhpur.


2. Dewal Kumari D/o Girdhari Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Saran Nagar, Digadi Kallan, Jodhpur.


3. Shubham Bhati S/o Balkishan Bhati, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Shardapuram Nagaur, Rajasthan.


4. Divya Tanwar D/o Prakash Tanwar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Purani Gannai, Bikaner.


5. Lavish Bhati S/o Mahendra Pratap Bhati, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bhati Billa, Nayadarwaja, Kakku Valo Ki Pol, Nagaur, (Raj.).


6. Asish Dangra S/o Goverdhan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 5, Chand Dairy Ke Pass, Gandhi Nagar, Dhola Bhatta, Ajmer.7. Vipashyana Sharma D/o Ashok Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Q-2, Shivaji Nagar, Jalore.


8. Pushpendra Sharma S/o Mahesh Krishan Sharma, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Post Bassi Jaipur.


9. Pooja Choudhary D/o Rajendra Choudhary, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Vishvakarma Nagar, Opp. Shiv Cold Store, Behind Bhadwasiya, Jodhpur.


10. Moxita Verma D/o Mahendra Verma, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 2-188 Mp Colony, Bangla Nagar, Bikaner.


11. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Law And Legal, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Raj.


----Respondents


D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 631/2025


Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary.


----Appellant


Versus


1. Prasiddhi Jain D/o Pradeep Kumar Jain, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Naugama, Banswara, Rajasthan.


2. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Prosecution, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).


3. Home Department, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.


----Respondents


D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 789/2025


Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer.


----Appellant


Versus


1. Shivani Puri D/o Hari Kishan Goswami, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 28-B Vayu Vihar Colony, Jhalamand Circle, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.


2. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Prosecution, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Raj.


3. Home Department, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.----Respondents


D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 823/2025


1. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Chairman, Ajmer.


2. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer.


----Appellants


Versus


1. Harshit Sharma S/o Shri Promod Kumar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Kushal Sadan, Plot No. 13, Imratiya Bera, Paota C Road, Jodhpur (Raj.).


2. Harshit Vyas S/o Shri Jeetendra Vyas, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Nathawato Ki Gali, Tapi Bawari, Jodhpur, Raj.


----Respondents


For Appellant(s) : Mr. Khet Singh Rajpurohit, Mr. Veeram Singh


For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.L. Bhati, AAG with Mr. Sukhdev Sharma, AGC, Ms. Abhilasha Bora, AGC, Mr. Pravin Vyas, Ms. Khushbu Choudhary, Mr. Dheeraj Jangid


HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI


HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA


Order


Reportable


12/08/2025

1. Brief facts of the case are that Rajasthan Public Service Commission issued an advertisement dated 07.03.2024 for the recruitment of Assistant Prosecution Officer under Rajasthan Prosecution Subordinate Service Rules, 1978 (‘Rules of 1978’), to fill 181 vacancies. The selection process was notified in two stages: a preliminary examination followed by a written mainexamination. The dispute was regarding the date by which candidates must have qualified the required eligibility criterion of an LLB degree, as prescribed in the advertisement.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant-RPSC has drawn attention of this Court towards a column in the advertisement, which is quoted as below:

vfuok;Z 'kS{kf.kd ;ksX;rk %

(1) Degree in Law (Professional) or integrated Law Course from a University established by law in India.

(2) Working knowledge of Hindi written in Devnagri Script and knowledge of Rajasthani dialects and social customs of Rajasthan.

Note%

1- vH;FkhZ dks okafNr 'kS{kf.kd vgZrk ¼'kS{kf.kd ;ksX;rk] vuqHko o vk;q bR;kfn½ gksus ij gh online vksuykbZu vko snu djuk pkfg; s rFkkfi vk;ksx }kjk vH;FkhZ dks vkWuykbZu vko snu i= dh vvuqer la'k s/ku frfFk rd vkWuykbZu vkosnu i= dks izR;kgfjr (Withdrawal) foMªkoy djus dk foyEi miyC/k gksxkA

2- vlR; ,oa xyr lwpuk ds vk/kkj ij vkosnu djuk rFkk vgZrk ugha gksus ij Hkh mls izR;kgfjr (Withdrawal) foMªkoy ugha fd;k tkuk Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ¼IPC-½ dh kkjk 182 ds rgr n.Muh; vijk/k gSA ,sl s vH;FkhZ dks dkykUrj es a dkamUlfyhax@ik=rk tkap@lk{kkRdkj ds nkSjku vik= fd; s tkus ij mUgs a vkxkeh ,d o"kZ dh vof/k ds fy, HkrhZ ijh{kkvk sa l s fooftZr ¼Debar½ fd;k tk,xkA

2.1. Learned counsel has further drawn attention of this Court towards the following columns in the advertisement, which reads as follows:-

vkosnu vof/k fnukad 14-03-2024 ls fnukad 12-04-2024 jkf= 12-00 cts
vkosnu izfdz;k 1. mDr in gsrq vkWuykbZu vkosnu i= Hkjus ls iwoZ loZizFke vH;FkhZ vk;ksx dh osclkbZV https://rpsc.rajasthan.gov.in ij miyC/k vkWuykbZu vkosnu i= Hkjus ds lEcU/k esa fn; s x; s fn'kk&funsZ'kksa - (Instructions for Applicants) vxzsth esa foLr`r foKkiu ,o a lEc af/kr lsok fu;e dk v/;;u vko';d :i l s dj y sos aA rnqijkUr gh vH;FkhZ vkWuykbZu vkosnu djs aA vk;ksx dh osclkbZV ij myyC/k vH;fFkZ;ksa ds fy, fn'kk & funsZ'k (Instructions for Applicants) vxzsth esa foKkiu dk gh Hkkx@ fgLlk ekuk tk; sxkA

2.2. Learned counsel has further taken this Court to the corrigendum dated 19.11.2024 issued by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer, the English translation of which reads as under:

“Press-note

Date: 19.11.2024

Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer

The Commission proposes to conduct the Assistant Prosecution Officer Home Department (Prosecution) Competitive (Preliminary) Examination, 2024 on 19.01.2025.

As per the conditions mentioned in the advertisement issued for the said examination, an opportunity is being provided to make online corrections in the name, photo, father's name, date of birth and gender of the candidate from 20.11.2024 to 28.11.2024. Candidates seeking correction can make online corrections in the application form of the concerned examination by depositing a fee of Rs. 500/ through e-mitra/online banking and by logging in through the Apply Online Link available on the Commission's online portal http://rpsc.rajasthan.gov.in or by logging in from the SSO Portal and selecting the Recruitment Portal available in Citizen Apps (G2C).

Use only the option of online correction for the said exam. Offline corrections will not be accepted. The above mentioned online correction opportunity is only a convenience for the benefit of the candidates. Corrections will be valid only in accordance with the eligibility conditions mentioned in the advertisement issued for the exam. The conditions of the advertisement will remain as before. In case of any technical difficulty regarding the above correction, you can contact recruitmenthelpdesk@rajasthan.gov.in by e-mail or on phone no. 9352323625

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top