[2026:RJ-JP:13887]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ,l-ch- flfoy fofo/k vihy la[;k 3715@2014

1- Jherh larks’k nsoh iRuh Lo- Jh jkexksiky] vk;q 43 o’kZ]

2- deythr dqMh iq= Lo- Jh jkexksiky] vk;q 25 o’kZ]

3- vuhrk iq=h Lo- Jh jkexksiky] vk;q 23 o’kZ]

4- mek iq=h Lo- Jh jkexksiky] vk;q 21 o’kZ]

5- lwjt ey dqMh iq= Lo- Jh chatkjke dqMh] vk;q 73 o’kZ] ¼e`R;q &

uke foyksfir½ leLr tkfr;ku & tkV] fuokfl;ku & [kkfr;ksa dk ckal] iks-

vuksiiqjk] rglhy vkesj] ftyk t;iqj ¼jkt0½A ---------------------------vihykFkhZx.k@DysesUV cuke

1- ftrsUnz iky flag iq= Jh xq:ehr flag] tkfr & flD[k tkV] vk;q o;Ld] fuoklh & xzke@iksLV nsgkyiqjk HkkbZdk] rglhy jkdiqjkQwy] ftyk HkVh.Mk ¼iatkc½ ¼pkyd okgu Vªd la[;k ih-ch- &10&,-,p- & 9615½A

2- gjsUnziky flag iq= Jh xq:ehr flag] tkfr & flD[k tkV] vk;q o;Ld]

fuoklh & xzke@iksLV nsgkyiqjk HkkbZdk] rglhy jkdiqjkQwy] ftyk HkVh.Mk ¼iatkc½ ¼iath;u Lokeh okgu Vªd la[;k ih-ch- &10&,-,p- & 9615½A

3- Jhjke tujy ba”;ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM] dk;kZy;& bZ&8 jhdks b.MLVªh;y ,fj;k] lhrkiqjk ,sfj;k] lhrkiqjk & t;iqj ¼jkt-½ tfj;s {ks=h;

izcU/kdA ¼ Vªd l[a ;k ih-ch-& 10&,-,p- & 9615 dh chek dEiuh½A -------------izR;FkhZx.k&foi{khx.k For Appellant(s) : Ms. Vijay Laxmi Jangid for Mr. J.R. Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Virendra Agrawal Mr. Prakhar Agrawal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA

Order

02/04/2026

1. This appeal has been filed under section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the appellants-claimants (hereinafter referred to as ‘claimants’) against the judgment and award dated 18.06.2014 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur in Motor Accident Claim Case 2009/2011, whereby the claim petition filed by the claimants was partly allowed by awarding total compensation of Rs.7,14,680/-

along with interest @ 6% per annum in favour of the claimants.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the claimants and the respondent No.3- Insurance Company jointly submit that during the pendency of this appeal, the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and accordingly a settlement has been arrived at between them by way of a compromise.

3. A copy of memo of compromise duly signed by the learned counsel for both the parties has been placed on record on 10.03.2026. On a specific query by this Court, learned counsel for both the parties submit that they are duly authorized by their respective parties to execute the memo of compromise, which reads as under:-

"1. That the parties have entered into compromise and the Claimant has given his free consent to compromise the matter for further enhancement of the compensation amount to the tune of Rs.3,50,000/- in all meaning thereby the Insurance company would make the payment of Rs.3,50,000/- in all, in addition to the amount already awarded by the Learned Tribunal.

2. That the amount would be deposited within six weeks from the date of compromise failing which it will carry interest @6% per annum from date of compromise till actual payment.

3. That the Appeal deserves to be disposed of in terms of the compromise."

4. Learned counsel for both the parties jointly pray that the present appeal be disposed of in light of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for both the parties and memo of compromise, it is directed that Insurance Company shall pay a sum of Rs.3,50,000/- in all, to the claimants, in addition to the amount already awarded by the learned Tribunal within a period of six weeks, failing which the above amount shall carry interest @ 6% per annum.

6. Accordingly, the impugned judgment and award dated 18.06.2014 is modified. The terms of memo of compromise shall be treated as an integral part of this order.

7. The instant appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

8. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

(SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /89