SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 11793

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR


S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16788/2022


Ms. Seema Pargi D/o Shri Laxman Lal Pargi, Aged About 27 Years, Resident of Village Khokharwa Post Dungarsaran, Tehsil Chikhali, Dungarpur, Rajasthan - 314030.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Sector 18, Kumbha Marg, Jaipur Rajasthan through Vice Chancellor.

3. The Controller of Examination, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur Rajasthan.

4. Principal, M.B. Health and Hygiene Nursing Education Institute, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.

----Respondents


For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hans Raj Kuldeep Ms. Neha Kalla

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Utkarsh Bafna for Dr. Mohit Singhvi


HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL


16/04/2026

Order

1. Petitioner is a student of B.Sc. Nursing course and was not permitted to appear in two papers of 4th year examination, due to non-completion of her four year course within a period of eight years in the light of Ordinance 299-V-10 of the University, hence, she preferred instant writ petition on 07.11.2022 with a prayer to permit her to appear in two due papers of 4th year of B.Sc. Nursing viz.

(i) Midwifery & Obstetrical Nursing; (ii) Management of Nursing Service & Education.

2. This Court vide interim order dated 09.11.2022 permitted the petitioner to appear in the two due papers provisionally. In pursuance thereof, petitioner was permitted to appear in the examination of two due papers and has been declared pass in the result dated 17.01.2023.

3. The issue crops up and survives in this writ petition is to grant a decree of B.Sc. Nursing four year course to petitioner or not, in the light of Ordinance 299-V-10 of the University, which reads as under:-

"O.299-V-10. Maximum number of attempts permitted for each paper will be 3 including the first attempt. Maximum period to complete the course successfully should not exceed 8 years."

4. Admitted and undisputed facts of the case are that petitioner got admission in the B.Sc. Nursing course in the year 2013 and has cleared Part I, Part II and Part III so also two papers of Part IV, and remaining two papers of Part IV viz. (i) Midwifery & Obstetrical Nursing; (ii) Management of Nursing Service & Education has also been cleared by petitioner as per result dated 17.01.2023. Admittedly, petitioner was permitted by the University to write the examination of Part IV of B.Sc. Nursing commencing in the Month of April 2022, but was not permitted to appear in the remand examination commencing in the Month of November, 2022, to clear the two due papers of Part IV, hence, this writ petition.

5. The contention of counsel for petitioner is that the provision of Ordinance is handmade procedure of law, which may be relaxed in case of petitioner, more particularly, considering the period of pandemic Covid-19 due to which the examination of Part IV of B.Sc. Nursing was not conducted by University in the year 2021. His submission is that the period of eight years as per Ordinance, beginning from year 2013, ends in the year 2021, but since in the year 2021, examination of Part IV B.Sc. Nursing was not conducted, hence, the University itself extended the period by one year i.e. upto next year i.e. 2022 and permitted the petitioner to appear in the examination commenced in the Month of April, 2022, but arbitrarily restrained her from appearing in the examination, commenced in the Month of November, 2022 itself.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the extension of limitation granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, considering the unprecedented situation of pandemic Covid-19 for the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022, as observed and held in In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation [(2022) 3 SCC 117]

7. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of University, on the strength of Ordinance 299-V-10, contends that the same is inflexible and once the petitioner could not complete her B.Sc. Nursing course within a period of outer limit of eight years, same cannot be extended by the Court. His further contention is that the scope of judicial review is matters involving education and examination system is extremely narrow and in similar circumstances, Coordinate Bench of this High Court did not grant indulgence and writ petitions were dismissed, which has been affirmed by the Division Bench.

8. Having considered the rival contentions of counsel for both parties and after going through the Ordinance 299-V-10 (supra), this Court is of the opinion that the provision of Ordinance may not be considered as rigid and inflexible that same cannot be relaxed even in exceptional and unprecedented circumstances. The situati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top