[2026:RJ-JD:17865]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4236/2026 Sunil Jaat S/o Durgaram, Aged About 23 Years, Near Sohan Ji Mali General Store Chopra Baadi Gangashahar, Police Station Gangashahar, District Bikaner. (Presently Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. HS Jodha, PP HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI

Order

17/04/2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties as well as perused the material available on record.

2. The instant bail application has been filed by petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.63/2026 dated 03.03.2026 registered at Police Station Gangashahar, District Bikaner for the offence under Sections 333, 324(2), 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190 of BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case while alleging that the petitioner, along with other co-accused, caused severe injuries to the complainant Jitendra and to injured persons Satyaprakash, Rajendra, and Abhishek. He submits that in the FIR, the complainant Jitendra has specifically attributed the act of causing injuries to co-accused Balia Jaat, who allegedly struck him on the head and hand using rods, sticks, and sharp weapons, resulting in a fracture of his left hand.He further submits that in the alleged incident, injured Satyaprakash, Abhishek, and Rajendra sustained injuries simple in nature, while complainant Jitendra suffered a fracture in his left hand and that the grievous injury suffered by Jitendra has been specifically attributed to the co-accused Balia Jaat. He also submits that the petitioner’s name is not present in the FIR and that the petitioner has no previous criminal antecedents, thus the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application; however, he is not in a position to refute the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that as per the injury report, injured Satyaprakash, Abhishek, and Rajendra sustained injuries simple in nature, while complainant Jitendra suffered a fracture in his left hand; the grievous injury suffered by Jitendra has been specifically attributed to the co-accused Balia Jaat. He is also not in a position to refute that the petitioner’s name is not present in the FIR and that the petitioner has no previous criminal antecedents.

5. In view of above and, having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case as available on record and looking to the fact that the trial will consume time and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner deserves to be released on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Sunil Jaat S/o Durgaram, arrested in relation to FIR No.63/2026 dated 03.03.2026 registered at Police Station Gangashahar, District Bikaner shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J surabhii/42-