HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Inderjeet Singh, Ashok Kumar Jain, JJ
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY AND TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER – Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4772/2024 | D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4114/2024 | D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12036/2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application of supreme court precedent regarding off-road vehicle tax exemption. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. granting of relief and refund of tax based on the established legal principle. (Para 4) |
Order
1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the issue involved in these writ petitions has already been considered and decided by Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Ultrachtech Cement Ltd. Vs. The State of Gujarat & Ors. reported as 2026 INSC 43, wherein it has been held as under:
"55. In view of the aforesaid discussion specially considering the pleadings and the material on record, we are of the conclusive opinion that the vehicles used by the appellants are vehicles of special types, precisely construction equipment vehicles which are suitable and are meant for use for operation and use within the industrial area/factory premises/ defined enclosed premises and are not meant for use on roads or public roads. They are off-road equipments and as such stand excluded not only from the purview of the “motor vehicle” as defined under Section 2 (28) of the Act but also from tax as Entry 57 of List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution only authorizes taxation of vehicles suitable for use on roads only. They are not even chargeable to road tax in view of Schedule I to Section 3 (1) of the Gujarat Tax Act which do not prescribes any tax for such kind of vehicles i.e., construction equipment vehicles. However, if any such kind of vehicles are found using roads, they would not be free from the rigors of Section 2 (28) of the Act and Section 3 of the Gujarat Tax Act and may also be subject to proceedings for seizure and penalty in accordance with the law."
2. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) has not disputed the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Ultratech Cement (supra).
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material placed on record.
4. In that view of the matter, these writ petitions are allowed and the impugned orders are set aside. Any tax amount deposited by the petitioner(s) under protest shall be refunded to the petitioner(s).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.