SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 12167

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Kuldeep Mathur, J
PARTU – Appellant
Versus
RAJU – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8153/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Raghuveer Singh Bhati
For the Respondents:

The court affirmed that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has the discretion to restrict the premature withdrawal of awarded funds kept in FDRs to ensure the long-term financial security of the claimants and prevent the misuse of the award.

Headnote:(A) Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - Premature Withdrawal of FDRs - Financial Stability - The objective of maintaining awarded amounts in fixed deposits is to ensure structured disbursement and prevent the risk of misuse or dissipation of funds; the Tribunal's discretionary order for partial release is justified and not arbitrary. (Para 4, 5)

Issues: Whether the order of the MACT Tribunal restricting the premature withdrawal of certain FDRs was arbitrary or illegal.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek premature release of mact fdrs for house repairs. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. purpose of fdrs is to ensure financial security and prevent fund dissipation. (Para 4)
3. mact order upheld as well-reasoned and petition dismissed. (Para 5 , 6)

Order

20/04/2026

By way of filing the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:-

“It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to:

i. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent Tribunal to allow premature withdrawal of remaining FDR amounts of the petitioners;

Partu: FDR No.12861RA00003796- Rs.1,00,000/-

Smt. Bhulki: FDR No.12861RA00003769 Rs.50,000/-

ii. Declare the impugned order dated 11.03.2026 as arbitrary to the extent it restricts full withdrawal;

iii. Pass any other order deemed fit in the interest of justice.

iv. Award cost of the petition.”

2. The present writ petition has been preferred against the order dated 11.03.2026 (Annexure-05) passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Banswara, in MACT Case No. 85/2024, whereby the application preferred by the petitioner for premature release of FDR Nos. 128610RA00003732, 128610RA00003796, 128610RA00003750, and 128610RA00003769 has been partly allowed. The amount available in FDR No. 128610RA00003732 (Rs. 1,00,000/-) in the name of Partu and FDR No. 128610RA00003750 (Rs. 1,00,000/-) in the name of Smt. Bhulki has been ordered to be released, whereas the premature release of FDR Nos. 128610RA00003796 and 128610RA00003769 has been rejected.

3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court finds that petitioner No. 1, Partu, aged about 63 years, and petitioner No. 2, Smt. Bhulki, aged about 69 years, had filed applications for premature release of the FDRs for the purpose of repairing their residential house. The learned MACT Tribunal, after considering the material on record and the age of the petitioners, in its discretion, ordered the premature release of FDR Nos. 128610RA00003732 and 128610RA00003750.

4. This Court finds no illegality in the order passed by the learned MACT Tribunal. The object of issuing directions for keeping a portion of the awarded amount in fixed deposits for the benefit of the relatives/legal heirs of the victim is to ensure financial stability, as well as structured and secure disbursement of funds. The said directions are also intended to oblivate the risk of misuse or dissipation of awarded amount on account of imprudent financial decisions or avoidable expenditure, thereby safeguarding long-term financial security.

5. This Court is of considered view that the impugned order dated 11.03.2026 (Annex.5) passed by the MACT Court, Banswara, in MACT Case No. 85/2024 to be well-reasoned and justified.

6. Consequently, no case for the premature release of FDR Nos. 128610RA00003796 and 128610RA00003769 is made out. Accordingly, the present writ petition, along with the stay application, is dismissed as being devoid of merit.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top