[2026:RJ-JP:16862]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7251/2026

1. Salmu Din S/o Umaar Din, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Basalya Ki Dhani Khurd Gwalda, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 40 Ga 2816, Rj 40 Ga 3216, Rj 40 Ga

2716 And Rj 40 Ga 3716.

2. Abdul Khan S/o Umar Deen, R/o Basaiya Ki Dhani, Guwalda, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 14 Gk

2745

3. Hans Raj S/o Nawal Singh, R/o Paharwas, Alwar, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No.

Rj 40 Ga 2210 ----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary.

2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary.

3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

4. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Kotputli, District Kotputli Behror (Rajasthan).

5. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Rajasthan).

6. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Alwar, District Alwar (Rajasthan).

7. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Sikar, District Sikar (Rajasthan).

8. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Jaipur First, District Jaipur (Rajasthan).

Dausa.

13. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Kota, District Kota. 14. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Tonk, District Tonk.

15. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Bhiwadi, District Khairthal Tijara. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aatish Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tanishq Aditya Parmar for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Judgment

21/04/2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the instant lis is no more res integra, and is already addressed by the ratio encapsulated in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6034/2026 titled Dayanand Bharia and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. decided vide judgment dated 02.04.2026.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State Mr. Tanishq Aditya Parmar appearing on behalf of learned AAG Mr. S.S. Naruka has not disputed the said fact.

3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in light of the ratio of Dayanand Bharia (supra) and Lakhpat & Ors. V. State of Rajasthan: S.B.CWPNo.5692/2026, which shall be squarely applicable to the instant petition. The petitioners are directed to mark their attendance on 30.04.2026 at or around 11:00 AM before the competent/appropriate authority. It is directed that the said authority shall pass a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law, within an upper limit of 15 days from the date of petitioners being present.

4. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/9