SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 12342

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Sameer Jain, J
SALMU DIN S/O UMAAR DIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7251/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Aatish Jain
For the Respondents: Tanishq Aditya Parmar, S.S. Naruka

The court applied the ratio of previously decided writ petitions to the present case, directing the competent authority to pass a speaking order after the petitioners' appearance.

Headnote:(A) Writ Jurisdiction - Application of Precedent - Where the facts of the case are identical to a previously decided matter, the ratio of the earlier judgment is applicable and binding. (Para 1, 3)

Issues: Whether the petitioners are entitled to the same relief as granted in the cases of Dayanand Bharia and Lakhpat.

Table of Content
1. application of established legal precedent to a similar case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. direction to authority to pass a speaking order and disposal of the petition. (Para 3 , 4)

Judgment

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the instant lis is no more res integra, and is already addressed by the ratio encapsulated in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6034/2026 titled Dayanand Bharia and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. decided vide judgment dated 02.04.2026.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State Mr. Tanishq Aditya Parmar appearing on behalf of learned AAG Mr. S.S. Naruka has not disputed the said fact.

3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in light of the ratio of Dayanand Bharia (supra) and Lakhpat & Ors. V. State of Rajasthan: S.B.CWPNo.5692/2026, which shall be squarely applicable to the instant petition. The petitioners are directed to mark their attendance on 30.04.2026 at or around 11:00 AM before the competent/appropriate authority. It is directed that the said authority shall pass a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law, within an upper limit of 15 days from the date of petitioners being present.

4. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top