HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
[2026:RJ-JD:18993]
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8678/2026
1. Kamlesh Ameta S/o Bhagwati Lal Ameta, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Purohit Wadi, Vpo Salumber, District Udaipur (Now District Salumber).
2. Vimal Kumar Kalal S/o Tulsi Ram Ji, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 38, Vpo Manpur, Tehsil Jhadol, District Udaipur.
3. Ganesh Lal Teli S/o Sohan Lal Teli, Aged About 37 Years, R/o 151, Ward No. 2, Chungi Naka, Teliyo Ki Basti, Salumbar, District Udaipur (Now District Salumbar).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj (Panchayati Raj), Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Additional Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. District Programme Coordinator And District Collector, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Udaipur, Rajasthan.
5. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Reodar, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.
6. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Pindwara, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
22/04/2026
Order
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking direction to the respondents to make pay fixation of the petitioners equal to the similarly situated persons having been selected in the same selection process while stepping up the pay of the petitioners equal to them and that the petitioners may be granted benefit of seniority, promotion and other consequential benefits.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in similar nature writ petition filed at Jaipur Bench being Nand Kishore Sharma & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writs No.12109/2018, decided on 18.07.2018 on the submissions made by counsel the respondents have been directed to decide the representation made by the petitioners therein and, therefore, a similar direction may be granted in the present case.
3. In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with similar direction as given in the case of Nand Kishore Sharma (supra), wherein, it was directed as under:-
“In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than three months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.
The stay application also stands disposed of.”
4. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
5. The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioners would be entitled to the relief.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.