SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 12402

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR
SMT. NANDU DEVI – Appellant
Versus
HANUMAN BHAI D. ATHWAL – Respondent
CW / 8713 / 2026



[2026:RJ-JD:19038]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8713/2026

1. Smt. Nandu Devi W/o Surjaram, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of Todi Ki Dhani, Village Nimba Ka Bas, Post Bansa, Tehsil Deedwana, District Deedwana-Kuchaman (Raj.).

2. Sujaram S/o Bhaguram, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Todi Ki Dhani, Village Nimba Ka Bas, Post Bansa, Tehsil Deedwana, District Deedwana-Kuchaman (Raj.).

----Petitioners Versus

1. Hanuman Bhai D. Athwal S/o Dana Bhai, Resident Of 96, Gopal Nagar Society, Near Swami Narayan Temple, Mandwi, Police Station And Tehsil Mandwi, District Surat (Gujarat). (Driver And Owner Of Vehicle Car No. Gj-19-

Be-2938).

2. S.b.i. General Insurance Company Limited, Through Manager, Second Floor, Plot No. 09, Dwarka Niwas Kailashpuri, Tonk Road, Jaipur - 302018, Having Its Local Office At City Centre Building, 3Rd Floor, Block A, Near Sanghi Petrol Pump, Station Road, Sardarpura, Jodhpur, Raj. - 342001, Policy No. Tsb/30400452 (Insurance Validity Date 16-04-2022 To 15-04-2023). (Insurer Of The Vehicle Car No. Gj-19-Be-2938).

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Nehra For Respondent(s) : -

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

22/04/2026 By way of filing the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs;-

‘It is therefore, in these circumstances of the case, most humbly prayed that the writ petition may kindly be allowed and issue a writ, direction or orders to the effect that:-

i) directions may be passed to the learned tribunal to allow petitioners for pre-mature payment of FDR amounts and;

ii) to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 12.08.2025 (Annex.-7) and;

iii) to pay pre-mature amounts of (i) TDR (FD) no.20987656 of on of Rs.50,000/- payable on 21.12.2026, (ii) TDR (FD) no.20987502 of Rs.50,000/- payable on 21.12.2028, (iii) TDR (FD) no.2098517 of Rs.50,000/-payable on 21.12.2029, (iv) TDR (FD) no.20987537 of Rs.50,000/- payable on 21.12.2033 in the name of petitioner no.01, (v) TDR (FD)

no.20987570 of Rs.50,000/- payable on 21.12.2026, (vi) TDR (FD) no.20987586 of Rs.50,000/- payable on 21.12.2028, (vii) TDR (FD) no.20987615 of Rs.50,000/- payable on 21.12.2029, (viii) TDR (FD) no.20987635 of Rs.50,000/- payable on 21.12.2033 in the name of petitioner no.2, issued by the Punjab National Bank Didwana road Kuchaman city and;

iv) to allow any other relief or appropriate order which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioners.’

2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and upon perusal of the award dated 05.09.2023 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kuchaman City, in MACT Case No. 21/2023 (Smt. Nandu Devi & Anr. v. Hanuman Bhai & Anr.), as well as the order dated 12.08.2025 passed by the said Tribunal, this Court prima facie finds that the petitioners, who have been awarded compensation of ₹5,25,000/- each (total ₹10,50,000/-) on account of the untimely accidental death of their son, have sought premature release of the amount directed to be kept in FDRs by the MACT, Kuchaman City, on the ground that they require funds for completion and finishing of their under- construction house. The said application for premature release was rejected by the MACT, Kuchaman City, vide order dated

12.08.2025.

3. This Court is conscious of the fact that sufficient discretion is vested in the Motor Accident Claims Tribunals to direct that compensation amounts be kept in fixed deposits so as to prevent misuse. However, MACTs are not expected to adopt a rigid or mechanical approach in such matters. Applications seeking premature release of amounts deposited in fixed deposits ought to be considered keeping in view the financial condition and genuine requirements of the claimants.

4. In the present case, the application filed by the petitioners before the MACT, Kuchaman City, along with the photographs annexed thereto, clearly indicates that the petitioners, who are aged a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top