HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Sanjeet Purohit, J
LIKHMA RAM JAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8723/2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. non-compliance with appellate directions and violation of natural justice in administrative penalties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. judicial oversight of administrative non-compliance and procedural directions for response. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
Order
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a mining lease holder and undertaking the mining activities strictly in accordance with law, however, in the year 2021 a show cause notice was issued against the petitioner on a false complaint and penalty was imposed upon the petitioner in violation of principles of natural justice.
2. It is stated that even the respondent-authorities have deactivated the e-Ravanna of the petitioner. It is contended that while challenging the said action of the respondents an appeal was filed before the Court of learned Additional Director (Mines), Jodhpur Zone, Jodhpur (for short ‘Appellate Authority’) and vide order dated 13.01.2026 it has clearly held that the earlier orders passed by the respondent–authorities are in violation of principles of natural justice and while remanding the matter back to the Committee comprising of Mining Engineer, Sojat City, Mining Engineer (Vigilence), Jodhpur and AME, Balesar, directed to undertake fresh inspection and pass fresh orders within a period of two months.
3. It is also stated that inspite of lapse of more then four months, the respondents are not complying the directions given by the learned Appellate Authority. On one hand, inspite of the directions, the respondents are not complying with the order and on the other hand the respondents have also not activated the e-Ravanna in favour of the petitioner
4. Matter requires consideration.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply copy of writ petition to Mr. Lalit Pareek, who usually appears for Mining Department. Learned counsel for the Department shall complete his instructions and file reply to the writ petition within a period of two weeks.
6. Respondent shall specify the reasons for not making compliance of the order passed by the learned Appellate Authority within the time stipulated therein.
7. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the issues with regard to activation of e-Ravanna shall be considered on the next date of hearing.
8. List the matter on 11.05.2026 in ‘fresh category’ (subsequent listing).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.