SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 12403

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
SANJEET PUROHIT
LIKHMA RAM JAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8723/2026 Likhma Ram Jat S/o Multan Ram Jat, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Jajiwal Jakhron Ki Dhani, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Mines And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Department Of Mines And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Udaipur.

3. The Superintending Mining Engineer, Jodhpur Circle, Department Of Mines And Geology,jodhpur.

4. The Mining Engineer, Department Of Mines And Geology, Sojat City, Pali.

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Reddy Amar for Mr. Himanshu Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lalit Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Order

22/04/2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a mining lease holder and undertaking the mining activities strictly in accordance with law, however, in the year 2021 a show cause notice was issued against the petitioner on a false complaint and penalty was imposed upon the petitioner in violation of principles of natural justice.

2. It is stated that even the respondent-authorities have

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top