SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 12482

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Maneesh Sharma, J
VIKRAM ALIAS VEEKA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4753/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Laxmi Devi
For the Respondents: Hanuman Prajapati

The court may grant a second opportunity for bail to an accused whose bail bond was forfeited due to non-appearance caused by unforeseen circumstances and miscommunication, provided the accused undertakes to appear on all future dates.

Headnote:(A) Bail - Forfeiture of Bail Bond - Non-appearance of accused due to unforeseen circumstances and miscommunication - Grant of a second opportunity for bail is permissible if the court deems it just and proper, subject to strict conditions of appearance. (Para 5)

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to a second opportunity for bail after the forfeiture of his previous bail bond due to non-appearance before the Trial Court.

Table of Content
1. background of the case, reasons for bail bond forfeiture, and submissions by both parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's reasoning for granting a second opportunity for bail based on unforeseen circumstances. (Para 4 , 5)
3. formal order for release on bail with specific bond and surety conditions. (Para 6)

Order

1. The present bail application has been preferred under Section 483 B.N.S.S., 2023 , on behalf of the petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:

S.No. Particulars of the Case
1. FIR Number 172/2023
2. Concerned Police Station Raniwada
3. District Jalore
4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 302 and 460 of IPC, 1860

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier bail was granted to the petitioner by this Court vide order dated 22.01.2024 and during the currency of his bail, due to unforeseen circumstances, he was unable to appear before the learned Trial Court on the hearing dates. She further submits that due to some miscommunication, counsel for the petitioner failed to file exemption application before the learned Trial Court. Consequently, his bail bond was confiscated on 01.11.2025, he is in judicial custody since 19.12.2025. She also submits that the petitioner was released on bail in SBCRLMB No. 1645/2023, while considering the fact that the petitioner was a minor at that time, however, the petitioner has attained majority since then. Learned counsel assures this Court that in future, the petitioner will remain present on each and every date of the case before the learned trial court and if he again forfeit the bail bond then the indulgence of bail may not be extended to the petitioner.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposes the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and prays for dismissal of the present bail application.

4. Heard and considered the submissions and material available on record.

5. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, more particularly that on an earlier occasion, bail was granted to the petitioner by this Court vide order dated 22.01.2024; that due to unforeseen circumstances and miscommunication, the petitioner failed to appear before the learned Trial Court, accordingly his bail bond was forfeited; and the petitioner is in judicial custody since 19.12.2025, thus, I deem it just and proper to grant one more opportunity to the petitioner subject to the condition that he will appear before the learned trial court on each and every date of hearing, barring any unforeseen and unavoidable circumstances, failing which the Public Prosecutor will be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.

6. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S., 2023 is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Vikram @ Veeka S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar shall be enlarged on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top