[2026:RJ-JP:7452]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18523/2017

1. Udai Chand Meena Son Of Shri Ram Khiladi Meena, aged about 42 years, Resident Of Village Khediya, Post Jol, Tehsil Todabheem, District Karauli

2. Lakhan Lal Jatav S/o Shri Shiv Lal Jatav, aged about 44 years, Resident Of Village Jol, Viya Kariri, Tehsil Todabheem, District Karauli Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus

1. The State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj, Government Of, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Jaipur

3. District Collector, Karauli, District Karauli

4. The District Education Officer Elementary Education, Karauli

5. The Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Bol, Tehsil Todabheem, District Karauli

6. Mukesh

7. Lakhan Singh Gurjar, Both Through Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Bol, Tehsil Todabheem, District Karauli ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.D. Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mr. Saumil Sharma for Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

Order

17/02/2026

1. Application No.1/2025 filed for early hearing stands disposed.

2. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioners with following prayer:-

"(i) By issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby direct the respondents to cancel the entire selection process hereforth for appointment to the post of Gram Panchayat Sahayak conducted in Government Senior Secondary School, Boll, Tehsil Todabheem.

District Karauli;

(ii) By issuing an appropriate writ order or direction the respondents may kindly direct to re-hold the selection process transparently after including the petitioners in the interview for the post of Gram Panchayat Sahayak at Gram Panchayat, Boll Tehsil Todabheem, District Karauli and all such persons who applied for the post and make them selected as per merit of the candidates and be given them appointment on the said post with all consequential benefits.

(iii) Any other appropriate order or directions which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the humble petitioner."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy raised herein has already been decided by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court in case of Sunita Sharma Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1032/2017 decided on 24.05.2017 and further followed in case of Surendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18416/2017 decided on 05.08.2024 by a Co-ordinate Bench.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection in disposal of the writ petition in light of ratio laid down in cases of

5. Having considered aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed in light of ratio laid down in cases of Sunita Sharma Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra) and Surendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra).

6. Considered the grievance raised herein, the respondents- Authority are directed to decide the case of the petitioners in light of ratio laid down in case of Sunita Sharma Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra) and Surendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 60 days from date of receipt of a copy of this order. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation.

7. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioners, then same benefits be extended to the petitioners.

8. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/62