Bail may be denied where there is evidence of a systematic fraud (modus operandi) involving the sale of land to multiple parties and collusion with housing societies to defraud innocent purchasers, especially when the petitioner makes false statements to the court.

Order

1. The petitioner has filed this second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. after his first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 17.12.2025.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Chauhan, submitted that the complainant has lodged the impugned FIR bearing No.0210/2022 dated 10.06.2022 for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 384, 420, 406, 120-B & 506 of IPC at Police Station Ram Nagaria, Jaipur City (East). Learned counsel further submitted that it has been stated in the FIR that the complainant purchased the plot bearing No. C-78 through registered sale deed dated 30.07.2014 in the Residential Scheme namely, Sh. Narsingh Arcade floated by a private Residential Housing Society known as Narsingh Developers and Colonizers Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the housing society').

3. Mr. Deepak Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the complainant has alleged that when he tried to enter into his property bearing No. C-78 on 24.04.2022, he was obstructed by the persons as named in the FIR including the present petitioner as they were not allowing him to enter into the plot. Also, the petitioner had raised a boundary wall surrounding the plot and not allowing the complainant to construct his house. He further stated that accused-person are threatening him to surrender the papers of the plot and forcing him to sell the said plot to them and in view thereof, he filed the impugned FIR at the police station.

4. Learned counsel submitted that, police after conducting the investigation, has filed the charge-sheet bearing No.1/25 dated 28.12.2025 for offences under Sections 420, 406, 120-B & 384 IPC. He further submitted that the petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged offences, as the land in controversy belongs to his father and other relatives, who are khatedars and owners of the land however, they did some transactions with the above named Housing Society in the past. Learned counsel submitted that petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the impugned FIR. Learned counsel further stated that the petitioner is behind the bars since 31.10.2025 and other co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail either by the learned trial Court or the Coordinate Bench of this Court. In view thereof, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

5. This Court, while dismissing the first bail application vide order dated 17.12.2025, noted that there are as many as seven FIRs including the present one against the present petitioner and other persons who are also khatedars. All the FIRs were registered in the year 2022 and 2023, at the same Police Station with the same allegation. Considering the fact that so many FIRs were registered against the present petitioner and co-accused persons and in some of the matters police also noted some serious collusion between the present accused-petitioner and the other persons including the housing society, therefore, this Court directed the Investigating Officer of the said case to appear before the Court. In compliance of order dated 06.03.2026, Investigating Officer appeared before the Court and inf