[2026:RJ-JP:14553]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2923/2026 Julli S/o Shri Hakam Khan, Age 27 Years, R/o Village Paksedi, Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar.

(Presently Confined At Central Jail Alwar).

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shafat Rahim Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

08/04/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 25/2026 registered at Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar for the offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 61(2)(a) and 112(2) of BNS and Section 66(c) of IT Act.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that other co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the trial court vide order dated 31.01.2026. There is no transaction on record to show that petitioner has committed fraud or cheating with any person. Apart from the statements of police officials there is no substantive evidence available on the record indicating the petitioner's involvement in the alleged crime. It is also submitted that statement of so called complainant who lodged the complaint in the cyber portal was not recorded by the Investigating Officer. The Investigating Officer has acted upon solely on the basis of mobile recovered from the petitioner and other co-accused and concluded that petitioner alongwith the co- accused committed cheating. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and charge-sheet has already been submitted. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that other co-accused has already been enlarged on bail. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and charge-sheet has already been submitted. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Julli S/o Shri Hakam Khan, in connection with FIR No. 25/2026 registered at Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /28