Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 13149
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
[2026:RJ-JP:14726]
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4326/2026
Anil Yadav S/o Arjun Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Van Ki Dhani, Village Bhabhru, Police Station Bhabhru, District Kotputli. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur).
----Petitioner Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Swati Sharma Mr. Subhash Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
08/04/2026
Order
1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.579/2025 registered with the Police Station Harmara, District Jaipur (West) for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 74, 3(5), 351(2), 352, 324(4) and 79 of B.N.S., 2023.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the accused petitioner is named in the F.I.R. but, the police has also recovered CCTV Footage and the description given in the CCTV Footage, no role has been assigned to the petitioner. He also submits that in the alleged incident, the injured has sustained two injuries, out of which one injury is opined to be simple in nature and the other one has been opined grievous in nature, but the same are not on the vital part of the body. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 02.12.2025 and the police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. It is also submitted that no any other criminal case is pending against the petitioner and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Taking into consideration the over all facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that in the description of the CCTV Footage, no role has been assigned to the present petitioner and the police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
