SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 13215

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
SHARVAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:19593]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6187/2025

Sharvan S/o Shri Mana Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Kharad Ps Dhorimana District Barmer

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2. Devi D/o Achla Ram, R/o Dudapur Udasar Tehsil Dhorimana District Barmer

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hapu Ram Vishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, PP

Mr. R.J. Punia for complainant Mr. Deep Singh, CI, PS Dhorimana,

District Barmer

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

Order

24/04/2026

1. Mr. R.J. Punia, has put in appearance on behalf of the

respondent No.2-complainant.

2. Hence service is complete.

3. In pursuance of order dated 23.04.2026, SHO concerned is present in person. Under his instructions, learned State Counsel submits that due to some inadvertent facts, order of the learned trial Court could not be mentioned in the factual report. He submits that though explanation submitted by the concerned SHO is not convincing but in the facts and circumstances of the case, he is advised to remain careful in future while furnishing the

factual report before this Court.

(Uploaded on 01/05/2026 at 02

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top