HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Arun Monga, Sunil Beniwal, JJ
GOVERDHAN TANWAR – Appellant
Versus
SMT. MADHU TANWAR – Respondent
D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2217/2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties reached a settlement through mediation involving financial payments and visitation rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. agreement by parties to seek dissolution of marriage via mutual consent under section 13-b of hma. (Para 4) |
| 3. court allows appeal, sets aside the decree, and suggests waiver of the cooling period due to prolonged litigation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
Order(Oral)
Per: Arun Monga, J.
1. The present appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2024, passed by the learned Family Court No.2, Bikaner, whereby the divorce petition filed by the present appellant under Section 13(1), (1a) and (1b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter ‘HMA’), seeking dissolution of marriage was dismissed.
2. During pendency of the appellate proceedings, parties resorted to the mediation proceedings and as per the learned Mediator’s report dated 03.02.2026, mediation has been successful as the parties have decided to amicably part ways. Mediation report is reproduced hereunder:-
“Both parties Mr. Goverdhan and Mrs. Madhu have agreed that they shall settle the dispute and live separate peacefully. Mr. Goverdhan has agreed to pay Rs.12.50 lacs as full and final amount amount of which a fdr of Rs.8 lacs will be prepared in favour of son Chirag which cannot be encashed till him attaining age of 18 years. Remaining Rs.4.5 lacs will be used by Mrs. Madhu for her personal use. The parties have agreed that Mr. Goverdhan will have visitation rights with his son Chirag in presence and convenience of Mrs. Madhu. All the claims and due are settled herein and none of parties will claim any amount with each other except abovementioned Rs.12.5 lacs. Hence, mediation is successful.”
3. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that pursuant to the settlement arrived between the parties, a demand draft of Rs.4,20,000/- has been made in favour of the respondent-wife and another demand draft of Rs. 8,00,000/- has been made in favour of son, Chirag by the appellant which has been handed in course of the hearing to learned counsel for the respondent.
4. Both the learned counsels submit that in view of the compromise, the parties shall take appropriate steps for dissolution of their marriage on the ground of mutual consent by filing a petition under Section 13-B of HMA, before the competent Family Court. They also submit that in view of the compromise, the respondent does not wish to contest the appeal.
5. Accordingly, on joint consent, appeal is allowed. Consequently, the impugned judgment and decree dated 18.03.2024, is set aside with liberty to the parties to file appropriate petition under Section 13B, ibid, before the competent Family Court for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent.
6. Given that parties have been at lis for the past 4 years and have also been trying to settle the matter through mediation etc., learned Family Court shall pass appropriate orders to waive-off the cooling period of 6 months upon an application, if filed by parties jointly, seeking such indulgence.
7. All pending applications also stand disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.