SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 13328

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Farjand Ali, J
SABBIR KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1875/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Hardik Gautam
For the Respondents: Surendra Bishnoi

The court granted the petitioner liberty to submit a representation to the Superintendent of Police for a fair investigation, including verification of an alibi, and provided interim protection from arrest subject to BNSS and Arnesh Kumar guidelines.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Investigation - Fair Investigation - Direction to the Superintendent of Police to objectively consider a representation, specifically regarding the alibi of the petitioner being in custody in another matter. (Para 3)

(B) Arrest - Interim Protection - Grant of limited protection from arrest to enable the petitioner to seek remedy through representation, subject to compliance with statutory guidelines and judicial precedents for offenses punishable by less than seven years. (Para 4)

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to interim protection from arrest and liberty to submit a representation for a fair investigation.

Table of Content
1. withdrawal of petition with liberty to submit a representation to the competent authority. (Para 1 , 2)
2. ensuring fair investigation through objective consideration of representations and verification of alibi. (Para 3)
3. grant of interim protection from arrest subject to statutory and judicial guidelines for limited-punishment offenses. (Para 4)

Order

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press the instant criminal petition. However, he seeks liberty for the petitioner to submit a representation to the Superintendent of Police concerned, along with a direction to the said authority to consider and decide the same and to issue appropriate instructions to the Investigating Officer. He further prays for interim protection from arrest so as to enable the petitioner to avail the said remedy.

2. Accordingly, the instant criminal writ petition as well as the stay petition are dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioner to submit a detailed representation to the Superintendent of Police concerned, raising all the grounds urged in the present petition, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of this order.

3. In the event such a representation is submitted, the Superintendent of Police concerned shall objectively, independently and minutely consider the same. The Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the investigation is conducted fairly and impartially. It shall also be specifically examined by the Superintendent of Police himself as to whether the petitioner was in custody in another matter at the time of the alleged incident, as stated in the impugned FIR, and such aspect shall be given due and serious consideration while deciding the representation. All relevant documents submitted along with the representation shall also be duly taken into consideration. The representation shall be decided by a reasoned order within a period of 15 days from the date of its receipt, and thereafter, the result of the investigation shall be proceeded with and placed on record in accordance with law.

4. Considering the prayer so made, and only with a view to enable the petitioner to effectively raise his plea before the competent authority and to ensure a fair and impartial investigation, it is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested for a period of 30 days from today in connection with FIR No.74/2026, PS Balotra, District Balotra. The agency is further directed to ensure compliance of Section 33 of BNSS as well as guidelines issued by Hon’ble the Supreme Court in case of Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar [AIR 2014 SC 2756] the doctrine of which is applicable in all cases in which punishment is less than seven years. This order shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. All pending applications stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top