SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 13424

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
RAJESH KUMAR S/O MUNIRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.314/2024, registered at Police Station Malarna Doongar, District Sawai Madhopur, for the offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 121(1), 132, 109(1) of BNS and Section 3 of P.D.P.P. Act, the accused-petitioners have preferred this criminal miscellaneous bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that their names were disclosed by the other co-accused and apart from that there is no other substantive evidence against the petitioners to substantiate the fact that the petitioners were involved in illegal mining. It is further contended that the accused-petitioners are ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioners are not required, therefore, their anticipatory bail application may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail application and contended that the petitioners were involved in illegal mining, therefore, considering the nature of offence, their anticipatory bail applic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top