##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:12657]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1770/2026

Ramjilal Meena S/o Shri Kalyan Meena, Address Village Chhatarpura, Post Dantli, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.)

(At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur).

----Petitioner Versus

The State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

Order

25/03/2026

1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.210/2022 registered at Police Station Ramnagaria, District Jaipur City (East) for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 384, 420, 406, 120B & 506 of IPC. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for offences punishable under Sections 384, 420, 406 & 120B of

IPC.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that perusal of the FIR would reveal that matter is of a civil nature with regard to the ownership of the plot in question i.e. plot No.C-78 in the housing society ‘Shri Narsingh Arcade’. He argues that other FIRs have also been registered

(Uploaded on 17/04/2026 at 09:13:33 AM)

(Downloaded on 03/05/2026 at 01:21:23 AM)

[2026:RJ-JP:12657] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1770/2026] against the petitioner at the same police station on similar grounds. In those identical FIRs, benefit of bail has been granted to the petitioner by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is submitted that though initially, FIR was registered for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 384, 420, 406, 120B & 506 of IPC, but after investigation, police has filed charge-sheet only for offences punishable under Sections 384, 420, 406 & 120B of IPC for which maximum punishment is seven years. It is also submitted that petitioner has been convicted in any of the cases. It is submitted that offences are triable by Magistrate and the petitioner in custody since 31.10.2025 and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion and further custody of the

petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. She submits that petitioner is habitual offender as several other cases have been registered

against him.

4. I have considered the contentions.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that alleged offenes are triable by Magistrate, as also the fact that in identical FIRs, benefit of bail has been granted to the petitioner by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case,

I deem it proper to allow this bail application.

(Uploaded on 17/04/2026 at 09:13:33 AM)

(Downloaded on 03/05/2026 at 01:21:23 AM)

[2026:RJ-JP:12657] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1770/2026] 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Ramjilal Meena S/o Shri Kalyan Meena shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates

of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of

the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

LALIT MOHAN /46

(Uploaded o