##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JP:13370]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4704/2026

Jitendra Kumar S/o Gopal Ram Bijarniya, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Rukhasar, P.S. Ratangarh, Churu, (Raj.) Presently Confined

In Central Jail Jaipur.

----Accused-Petitioner Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sparsh Bansal, Adv., for Mr. Akshay Sharma, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Devi Singh, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

Order

30/03/2026

1. This instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.66/2024 registered at Special Police Station (S.O.G.), District ATS & SOG for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6 and 10 of the Rajasthan Public Examination (Measures to

Prevent Unfair Means in Recruitment) Act, 2022.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that similarly situated co-accused persons namely, Rakesh Jakhad, Kamalkant, Vikesh Kumar Maan, Ramprakash, Surjaram, Suresh Kuamr and Mitesh Kumar have been granted benefit of bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court

(Uploaded on 02/05/2026 at 01:37:08 PM)

(Downloaded on 03/05/2026 at 01:56:13 AM)

[2026:RJ-JP:13370] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4704/2026] as well as by this Court. He further submits that there is one criminal antecedent against the petitioner wherein, he is on bail. He argues that trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that the petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not

serve any fruitful purpose.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by

the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. I have considered the contentions.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that aforementioned co- accused persons have been granted benefit of bail a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court as well as by this Court and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case,

I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner– Jitendra Kumar S/o Gopal Ram Bijarniya shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do

so.

(Uploaded on 02/05/2026 at 01:37:08 PM)

(Downloaded on 03/05/2026 at 01:56:13 AM)

[2026:RJ-JP:13370] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4704/2026] 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned

police station, till trial is concluded.

8. Concerned SHO shall record the presence of the petitioner in Roznamcha. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned

Court in this regard.

9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial

Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court.

10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the

concerned SHO for necessary compliance.

11. The observation made hereinabove is only