[2026:RJ-JP:14985]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1611/2026 Sanjay S/o Sunil, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Kalwa, Police Station Nangal Chaudhary, District Mahendragarh (Hariyana) (At Present Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody At District Jail Kotputali).

----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

09/04/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.128/2025 registered at Police Station Bhabru, District Kotputli-Behror for the offences under Sections 111(2)(b) & 112(2) read with Section 49 of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3/25 and

25(6) Arms Act.

2. Heard.

3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been implicated as an accused on the basis of interrogation of other co-accused who was arrested. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been connected with this present criminal case on the basis of a pistol said to have been recovered at his instance however, for that the accused-petitioner has already facing another criminal case which was registered as an FIR No.303/2025 at Police Station Paniyala, District Kotputli-Behror. He further submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 08.11.2025 and the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted charge-

sheet.

5. Learned counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner was taken in custody in this case on a production warrant from the other criminal case which was registered on the basis of same recovery.

6. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the alleged firearm without license has been recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioner.

7. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 08.11.2025 and the Police has already submitted charge- sheet, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

8. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

9. In case the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in any other case in future, the Police may file application for cancellation of bail.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /35