SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 14224

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Baljinder Singh Sandhu, J
URN: CRLMB / 12825U / 2026
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5732/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Manphool
For the Respondents: Surendra Bishnoi, Naresh Bishnoi

Bail may be granted when the prosecutrix turns hostile and denies the alleged incident in her court testimony, thereby making the involvement of the accused doubtful, especially when the trial is expected to be prolonged.

Headnote:The petitioner sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in relation to offences registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 96, 65(1), 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 and Sections 3/4(2), 11/12 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The allegations involved the commission of rape and the recording of a video of the prosecutrix. The court noted that the prosecutrix, in her statement before the trial court, denied the incident and asserted that she had left her home of her own volition. The primary issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to bail given the evidence presented. The court observed that since the prosecutrix turned hostile and denied the entire incident in her court testimony, the involvement of the petitioner became doubtful. Furthermore, the court considered that the trial was likely to take a significant amount of time and there was no apprehension of the petitioner fleeing justice. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed.

Order

This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.213/2026 registered at Police Station, Lohawat, District Phalodi for the offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 96, 65(1), 351(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3 /4(2), 11/12 of POCSO Act, 2012 .

Counsel for the petitioner submits that after investigation charge-sheet has been filed against petitioner for the offence under Sections 137(2), 87, 96 BNS, 2023 and Sections 11 /12, 16/17 of POCSO Act. The allegations levelled against the petitioner is that he took the prosecutrix and committed rape and also recorded her video. It is stated that statement of the prosecutrix, who is now 19 years old, has been recorded before the trial court. She stated that no such incident of any kind happened with her and she had gone of her own will to her aunt’s house. The trial of case is likely to take a long time, thus, prayed to enlarge him on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

Counsel present for the respondent no.2 does not dispute the fact that the prosecutrix has turned hostile and she denies the entire incident.

The prosecutrix in her statement before the court has denied the incident and stated she has gone out of her own will to her aunt’s place. Thereafter, she was recovered by police while coming back. She denied of giving any statement before the police. So far as the statement before court are concerned, it is stated that the same was recorded under the pressure of police. In such circumstance the involvement of petitioner become doubtful.

Hence, looking to overall facts of the case and further keeping in view of the fact that conclusion of trial of case is likely to take time and the prosecution has not shown any apprehension of the petitioner fleeing away from justice, in case he is enlarged on bail; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS.

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Shrawan Ram S/o Kojaram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.213/2026 registered at Police Station, Lohawat, District Phalodi, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top