SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 14303

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Mukesh Rajpurohit, J
URN: CW / 16531U / 2026
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8986/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Harish Kumar Purohit
For the Respondents:

The court directed the concerned administrative authority to expeditiously decide upon a pending representation regarding the illegal double allotment of agricultural land and the request for alternative land allotment.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India seeking restoration of agricultural land or alternative allotment. The petitioner had been allotted land under the Rajasthan Colonization (Allotment and Sale of Government Land in the Indira Gandhi Canal Colony Area) Rules, 1975, and completed the required payments, but the land was subsequently allotted to another party. The court noted that a representation for the resolution of this double allotment remained undecided by the authorities. The primary issue is whether the respondent authorities are obligated to decide upon a representation regarding the cancellation of double allotment or the provision of alternative land. The court observed that although an endorsement was made on the petitioner's representation dated 09.10.2025, no formal order had been passed by the Allotment Officer. the present civil writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5 – the Allotment Officer and Assistant Commissioner, Colonization Department, Mohangarh-A, District Jaisalmer, to consider and decide the petitioner’s application/representation expeditiously, strictly in accordance with law.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks remedy for double allotment of agricultural land and failure of authorities to decide representation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. direction to administrative authority to decide pending representation expeditiously in accordance with law. (Para 4 , 5)

Order

1. By way of the present civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought following reliefs:-

“It is therefore, respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate, writ order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to restore the disputed land in favour of the petitioner by cancelling the allotment made in favour of the respondent No.6 or in the alternative respondents may kindly be directed to decide the representation Annex.5 and allot the alternative land elsewhere in lieu of the disputed land allotted to the petitioner by the allotment order Annex.1. Any other relief to which petitioner appears entitle to may kindly be also be passed in favour of the petitioner.”

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in the year 1999, the petitioner filed an application before the respondents seeking allotment of agricultural land under the provisions of the Rajasthan Colonization (Allotment and Sale of Government Land in the Indira Gandhi Canal Colony Area) Rules, 1975 and an allotment order was issued on 27.12.1999. The petitioner deposited 35% of the land price on 30.09.1999 and balance amount was deposited on 25.02.2013. However, land allotted to the petitioner has been illegally allotted by authorities in favour of respondent No.6.

3. It is further submitted that the petitioner subsequently submitted a representation dated 09.10.2025 (Annex.5) requesting cancellation of the alleged double allotment and seeking allotment of suitable land at an alternative location. It is contended that although an endorsement has been made on the petitioner’s representation, but no order has been passed by respondent No.5 – the Allotment Officer and Assistant Commissioner, Colonization Department, Mohangarh-A, District Jaisalmer till date. It is, therefore, prayed that appropriate directions to respondent No.5 be issued to consider and decide the application/representation of the petitioner at the earliest.

4. In view of above, the present civil writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5 – the Allotment Officer and Assistant Commissioner, Colonization Department, Mohangarh-A, District Jaisalmer, to consider and decide the petitioner’s application/representation expeditiously, strictly in accordance with law.

5. Stay petition and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top