SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 14399

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
NUPUR BHATI
URN: CW / 435U / 2015
CW / 136 / 2015



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:21282]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 136/2015

Amarjeet Singh Rathore S/o Sh. Raghuveer Singh, aged about

34 years, resident of 59, Gulshan Nagar, Ramura Road, Udaipur

(Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary to the

government Department of Rural Develpment & Panchayati Raj

Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Jila Parishad, Jodhur, through its Chief Executive Officer.

----Respondent

Connected with

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2282/2015

Surya Prakash Upadhyay S/o Sh. Shanti Lal Sharma, aged 27

years, B/c Brahmin, R/o 1/A/34 Housing Board, Gandhi Nagar,

Chittorgarh (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Rajasthan through the Secretary Department of

Education, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur Rajasthan.

2. The Board of Secondary Education, Ajmer, through its

Coordinator, Rajasthan Teacher Eligibility Test.

3. Zila Parishad through Chief Executive Officer, Rajasmand,

Rajasthan.

4. Additional Examination Controller Cum Chief Executive

Officer, Zila Parishad, Rajasmand, Rajasthan.

---Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Divik Mathur.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Solanki.

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI

Order

05/05/2026

1. None is present for the petitioner in S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.2282/2015, even in the second round.

(Uploaded on 05/05/2026 at 03:20:15 PM)

(Downloaded on 08/05/2026 at 09:59:18 AM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JD:21282] (2 of 5) [CW-136/2015]

2. These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners with

the following prayers:

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 136/2015

“(i) By an appropriate writ, order or direction the condition

no. 7 (1) (ख) and (2) (ख) of the advertisement dated 11.08.2013

(Annexure-1) issued by respondent no. 2, may kindly be declared

illegal and be quashed and set aside, to the extend it does not

recognize the certificate of Teacher Eligibility Test (TET)

conducted by the central government, and

(ii) That further the respondents may kindly be directed to

consider the certificate of TET conducted by the central

government as a qualification under the advertisement dated

11.08.2013, and to consider the certificate of CTЕТ of the

petitioner (Annexure6), for the purpose of selection process and

to grant him appropriate marks for the same, and

(iii) That further the respondents may be directed to place the

petitioner in the merit list after granting him the appropriate

marks, and to give him appointment on the post of teacher

grade III (Level ii) under the advertisement dated 11.08.2013.

(iv) Any other appropriate writ order or direction, which this

Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and

circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in the favour of

the petitioner.

(v) Cost of the writ petition may kindly be awarded to the

petitioner.”

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2282/2015

“A/ By an appropriate writ order or direction, the

respondents may kindly be directed to permit the petitioner to

participate in the recruitment by taking into consideration his

CTET qualification.

B/ By an appropriate writ order or direction, the

respondents may kindly be directed to grant relaxation to the

petitioner in qualification for clearing RTET in pursuance of the

Section 23(2) of the Act of 2009.

C/ By an appropriate writ order or direction, the

respondents may kindly be directed to consider the candidature

of the petitioner for the post of Teacher Grade-III (Level-II) and

afford him appointment if otherwise they stand in merit.

D/ Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this

Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and

circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the

petitioner.

(Uploaded on 05/05/2026 at 03:20:15 PM)

(Downloaded on 08/05/2026 at 09:59:18 AM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JD:21282] (3 of 5) [CW-136/2015]

Writ petition filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed with

E/ costs.”

2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent - Zila

Parishad, Jodhpur issued an advertisement (Annex.1) for filling up

the posts of Teacher Grade III, Level–I and Level–II, pursua

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top