SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 14448

[2026:RJ-JP:18758-DB]


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR


D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 161/2026

In

D.B. Criminal Appeal No.43/2026


Hargyan S/o Moolchand, Resident Of Raghunathpura, P.s. Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.

(Presently Confined In District Jail Gangapur City)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

----Respondent


For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, Dy.G.A. with

Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma

Ms. Neha Goyal


HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL


04/05/2026

Order

1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the accused-applicant along with the appeal.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been convicted for the offences under Sections 447, 302/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1908.

3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that the accused-applicant was on bail during trial and presently, he is serving his sentence in District Jail, Gangapur City. He further submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter and the allegation of causing head injury on the person of deceased is against co-accused Nemi and Kulhari has also been recovered at the instance of co-accused Nemi. He further submits that no recovery has been made from the accused-applicant and sentence of life imprisonment has been awarded to the accused-applicant for the offence under Section 302/34 of IPC. He further submits that the appeal is not likely to be heard in near future and prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicant may be suspended and he be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal.

4. Learned Deputy Government Advocate has opposed the application for suspension of sentence.

6. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, and also considering the facts that the accused-applicant was on bail during trial; the allegation of causing head injury on the person of deceased is against co-accused Nemi; hearing of appeal may take long time, we deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application.

8. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 02.07.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top