SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 14450

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Inderjeet Singh, Bhuwan Goyal, JJ
URN: SOSA / 1115U / 2026
D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 574/2026 | D.B. Criminal Appeal No.133/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Kamlendra Singh, Kamlendra Sihag
For the Respondents: Naresh Gupta, Vinod Kumar Sharma, Neha Goyal

Suspension of sentence may be granted during the pendency of an appeal if the conviction is based on circumstantial evidence and the appeal is unlikely to be heard in the near future.

Headnote:The applicant was convicted under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 302, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1908, and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The case involves a conviction for murder where the trial court relied on circumstantial evidence after disbelieving eyewitness accounts. The applicant has served over six years of his life sentence. The primary issue is whether the sentence should be suspended pending the appeal. The court observed that since the conviction is based on circumstantial evidence and the appeal is unlikely to be heard in the near future, suspension of sentence is just and proper. This criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal.

Table of Content
1. grounds for seeking suspension of sentence based on time served and nature of evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. discretion to suspend sentence based on circumstantial evidence and judicial delay. (Para 6 , 7)
3. grant of bail and suspension of sentence pending appeal. (Para 8 , 9)

Order

1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the accused-applicant along with the appeal.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been convicted for the offences under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 323, 341, 302 & 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1908 and Section 3 & 25 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that the accused-applicant was not on bail during trial and presently, he is serving his sentence in District Jail, Shri Ganganagar. He further submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter and he has served the sentence for more than six years. He further submits although, the FIR has been lodged by the borther of the deceased, however, during trial, the learned Trial Court disbelieved the statement of eye witnessess and held that it is a case of circumstantial evidence. He further submits that the accused-applicant has been connected to the alleged crime solely on the basis of call detail records and no recovery has been made at the instance of accused-applicant. He further submits that recovery of pistol has been made at the instance of co-accused Yogendra @ Master and the fire arm injury has been caused by co-accused Yogendra @ Master. He further submits that the sentence of life imprisonment has been awarded to the accused-applicant for the offence under Section 302 /34 of IPC. He further submits that the appeal is not likely to be heard in near future and prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicant may be suspended and he be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal.

4. Learned Deputy Government Advocate has opposed the application for suspension of sentence.

6. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, and also considering the facts that it is a case of circumstantial evidence as held by the learned Trial Court and hearing of appeal may take long time, we deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application.

8. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 02.07.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top