##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:23348]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8542/2025

Vikram Singh S/o Shri Rampal Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o

Lakhlan Badi Tehsil Rajgarh District Churu Rajasthan (Presently

Lodged In Dist Jail Churu)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Charan

Ms. Alisha Dargar, thorugh VC

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP

Mr. Abhishek Aggarwal

Mr. Tirupati Chandra

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

Order

15/05/2026

1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is

filed by the applicant-accused Vikram Singh S/o Rampal

Singh seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as

FIR No. 140/2023 dated 22.03.2023 registered at P.S.

Rajgarh, District- Churu, for the offence under Sections 341,

323, 325, 307 and 302 of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant submits that the

applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the

investigation against him is complete and he is no more

required in investigation. He further submits that there are

no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the

jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the

applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate

with investigation/trial, which will take time.

(Uploaded on 16/05/2026 at 12:38:48 PM)

(Downloaded on 18/05/2026 at 09:15:03 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:23348] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8542/2025]

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant submits that

PW-7 (Dr. Sanjive Kaler) and PW-16 (Dr. Somveer) have

specifically pointed out that no sharp-edged weapon was

used in inflicting injuries upon the deceased. He further

submitted that the petitioner has been implicated due to

animosity and that the evidence brought on record by the

prosecution is not sufficient to nail him to the charges

framed against him.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the

complainant opposed the aforesaid contentions and

vehemently opposed the bail application, submitted that the

allegations are grave and serious in nature. They further

submitted that the trial is at the fag end and only one

witness remains to be examined, and the trial is likely to

conclude soon.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both

the parties.

6. Arising out of FIR No. 140/2023 dated 22.03.2023 registered

at P.S. Rajgarh, District Churu, the police filed a charge-

sheet against Vikram Singh, and only he is facing trial in the

instant case. The list of witnesses indicates that 17

witnesses were cited, out of whom 16 have already been

examined by the trial Court. The statement of the learned

Public Prosecutor indicates that only one witness remains to

be examined and the same is likely to be examined at the

earliest.

(Uploaded on 16/05/2026 at 12:38:48 PM)

(Downloaded on 18/05/2026 at 09:15:03 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:23348] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8542/2025]

7. We have gone through the statements referred to by the

learned counsel for the petitioner and also perused the

statements of other witnesses, as it is a question of

interpretation about ocular testimony vis-a-vis expert

evidence. The trial Court is the best judge to decide the

issue regarding the discrepancy between the ocular evidence

and the medical evidence.

8. Therefore, considering the statement of the learned Public

Prosecutor, this is not a fit case to enlarge the petitioner-

accused on bail, as he is the only person facing trial for the

charges alleged against him by the complainant. In view of

the discussion made hereinabove, no case is made out for

grant of bail at this stage.

9. Accordingly, the application for bail filed under Section 483

of BNSS preferred by Vikram Singh S/o Rampal Singh is

hereby dismissed

10. The learned trial Court is directed to record the statement of

the last witness as early as possible and thereafter proceed

to record the statement of the accused and conclude the

defence evidence as expeditiously as possible. The tr