HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR
PUSHKARLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 3942 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:23596] (1 of 4) [CRLMB-3942/2026]
[2026:RJ-JD:23596]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 3942/2026
Pushkarlal S/o Kishor Gameti, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of
Kala Godwa, Mera Ka Guda, Police Station Sukher, District
Udaipur, Rajasthan (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gopal Singh Bhati.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
ORDER
15/05/2026
1. This second application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS
(439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been
arrested in connection with FIR No.379/2025 registered at Police
Station Sukher, District Udaipur, for offences under Sections 8/21
of the NDPS Act.
2. As per the prosecution, on 14.07.2025, during routine
patrolling, a police team from Police Station Sukher apprehended
a boy who, upon noticing the police party, attempted to flee. Upon
search, 15 plastic bottles, each containing 100 ml of cough syrup,
were recovered from his possession. The petitioner was thereafter
arrested.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case.
According to learned counsel, the alleged contraband falls only
marginally above the prescribed commercial quantity when
(Uploaded on 17/05/2026 at 02:10:18 PM)
(Downloaded on 18/05/2026 at 09:25:25 PM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:23596] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-3942/2026]
calculated along with the total liquid content of the syrup. It was
contended that the recovery is thus on the borderline of
commercial quantity and, therefore, the rigours of Section 37 of
the NDPS Act deserve liberal interpretation in the peculiar facts
and circumstances of the case. Learned counsel further submitted
that no other criminal case of similar nature is pending against the
petitioner.
4. Lastly, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case is likely to
consume considerable time. On these grounds, it was prayed that
the petitioner be enlarged on bail.
5. Per contra, the learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently
opposed the bail application and submitted that psychotropic
substance (greater than commercial quantity) was recovered from
the conscious possession of the present petitioner and therefore,
looking to the seriousness of the allegation levelled against the
present petitioner, he does not deserve to be enlarged on bail by
this Court.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
material available on record.
7. Having considered the rival submissions and the facts and
circumstances of the case, this Court prima facie finds that 15
plastic vials containing narcotic corex syrup containing codeine
were recovered from the conscious possession of the present
petitioner. Each vial contained 100 ml of syrup, making the total
quantity of narcotic corex syrup containing codeine to be 1500 ml.
8. In Hira Singh vs. Union of India; (2020)20 SCC 272, the
Supreme Court held that, for the purpose of determining “small
quantity” or “commercial quantity” under the NDPS Act, the total
(Uploaded on 17/05/2026 at 02:10:18 PM)
(Downloaded on 18/05/2026 at 09:25:25 PM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:23596] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-3942/2026]
weight of the narcotic drug or psychotropic substance along with
any neutral substance forming part of the mixture is to be
considered, and not merely the actual content of the offending
drug. The Court overruled the contrary view taken in E. Micheal
Raj v. Intelligence Officer and emphasized that such
interpretation is consistent with the object and scheme of the
NDPS Act to curb drug trafficking effectively.
9. From a perusal of case file, this Court prima facie finds that
the psychotropic substance (marginally higher than the
commercial quantity) was recovered from the conscious
possession of the present petitioner; the petitioner is in judicial
custody since 14.07.2025 and the tria
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.