HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
SANJESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 458 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:23137]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 458/2026
Sanjesh Kumar S/o Sh Maharaj Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o
Kucheli Eli, Tehsil Vidhula, Police Station Vidhula, District Oraiya,
Uttar Pradesh, At Present Hari Om Nagar, Boranada, Jodhpur,
Rajasthan. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Jodhpur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Kumar Gurjar
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
Order
14/05/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed by the applicant
under Section 483 BNSS (439 Cr.P.C). The applicant has been
arrested in connection with FIR No. 297/2025 registered at
Police Station Boranada, District Jodhpur for the offence(s)
under Sections 85, 80(2) and 316(2) of BNS.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the
applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He
further submits that, after completion of investigation, the challan
was filed against the petitioner under Sections 85, 80(2), and 108
of the BNS. He further submits that the petitioner is the sole
accused in the matter and is the husband of the deceased. The
complainant is the father of the deceased, namely Shyam Singh,
at whose instance the FIR was lodged, and Rishi Kumar, brother of
the deceased, is also a witness in the case. In the FIR, allegations
(Uploaded on 14/05/2026 at 04:49:04 PM)
(Downloaded on 18/05/2026 at 11:41:56 PM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:23137] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-458/2026]
of demand of dowry were levelled against the petitioner, and it
was alleged that, due to such demand, the deceased committed
suicide. Learned counsel has further drawn the attention of this
Court to the statements of the complainant-father and the brother
of the deceased, submitting that both of them do not support the
case of the prosecution. He submits that, in their examination-in-
chief, they did not allege any demand of dowry or harassment
against the petitioner. Further, during cross-examination, they
denied that the deceased was subjected to any kind of cruelty or
that there was any demand of dowry by the petitioner soon before
her death. The applicant has been in judicial custody since the
date of his arrest. The trial is likely to take considerable time to
conclude. Therefore, learned counsel prays that the applicant may
kindly be enlarged on bail.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed
the bail application.
4. This Court has considered the arguments advanced by the
counsel for the parties and perused the documents on record. The
statements of father and brother of the deceased clearly denies
the fact that the deceased was subjected to any kind of cruelty or
any demand of dowry was made soon before her death by the
petitioner. Both the witnesses have clearly turned hostile. In view
of the statement so far as recorded, the involvement of the
petitioner becomes doubtful.
5. Hence, keeping in view of the fact that conclusion of the trial
of the case is likely to take time and the prosecution has not
shown any apprehension of the petitioner fleeing away from
(Uploaded on 14/05/2026 at 04:49:04 PM)
(Downloaded on 18/05/2026 at 11:41:56 PM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:23137] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-458/2026]
justice, in case he is enlarged on bail; but, without expressing any
opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to
grant bail to the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS
(439 Cr.P.C.) is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-
applicant Sanjesh Kumar S/o Maharaj Singh arrested in
connection with aforesaid FIR shall be enlarged on bail provided
he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two
sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned
lower court for his appearance before the court concerned on all
the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J
11-Jatin/-
(Up
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.