HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
DEVENDER KUMAR ALIAS VIRENDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 3710 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:23325]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 1st Bail Application No. 3710/2026
Devender Kumar @ Virender S/o Ramesh Kumar, Aged About 24
Years, Resident Of Ward No. 07, Ramsra Jakhran, Teh.
Suratgarh, Dist. Sriganganagar. C/r Ward No. 23, Overbridge
Kepass, Sangriya, P.s. And Teh. Sangriya, Dist.-Hanumangarh.
(At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Hanumangarh)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Beniwal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. H.S. Jodha, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order
14/05/2026
1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is
filed by the applicant-accused Devender Kumar @
Virender S/o Ramesh Kumar seeking bail in respect of a
criminal case registered as FIR No.626/2025 dated
26.11.2025 registered at P.S. Sangriya, District -
Hanumangarh, for the offence under Sections 64(2)(f),
64(2)(m), 351(3) of BNS.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant
has been falsely implicated in the matter and the
investigation against him is complete and he is no more
required in investigation. He further submits that there are
no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the
jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the
(Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 11:53:25 AM)
(Downloaded on 18/05/2026 at 11:49:41 PM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:23325] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-3710/2026]
applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate
with investigation/trial, which will take time.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for incident
between 02.11.2025 to 07.11.2025 the report is registered
on 26.11.2025 but without explaining the reasons of delay.
He further submitted that there is no evidence except the
oral statement of victim who is a close relative of petitioner
accused. He also submitted that victim has not informed
about incident when she was staying in house of her
paternal aunt. He also referred the statement of prosecutrix
recorded under Section 183 of BNSS and submitted that if
prosecutrix had returned to her home on 08.11.2025 and
she narrated incident to her mother then a report can be
lodged immediately but no action was taken. At last he
submitted that petitioner accused is in custody since his
arrest on 03.12.2025.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail
application and submitted that the allegations are grave and
serious in nature.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned
Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by
both the parties.
6. On 26.11.2025 complainant an 18 years old female victim
has lodged a report on 26.11.2025 at Police Station
Sangriya, District Hanumangarh for rape committed by her
uncle (Fufa) from 02.11.2025 to 07.11.2025 FIR
No.626/2025 was registered. During investigation statement
of victim were recorded under Section 180 and 183 of BNSS.
(Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 11:53:25 AM)
(Downloaded on 18/05/2026 at 11:49:41 PM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:23325] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-3710/2026]
Present petitioner was arrested on 03.12.2025 and a charge-
sheet is filed against him under Section 64 (2) (f), 64(2)
(m), 351(3) of BNS. The age of victim is more than 18
years.
7. There is no doubt about the fact that petitioner accused is a
close relative of victim and considering the relationship there
was a delay but the Court has to consider the fact that
victim is only star witness in the case and criminal case is
based upon oral testimony of victim. The petitioner accused
is arrested on 03.12.2025 and a charge-sheet has already
been filed.
8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we
have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in
the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time.
The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore,
looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case
and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case,
the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-
accused.
9. Thus, the instant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.