HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR
MANISH BISHNOI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
CW / 12556 / 2025
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:23191]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12556/2025
Manish Bishnoi S/o Shri Bhenpa Ram Bishnoi, Aged About 36
Years, Working As A Sepoy (Int) Posted At 879 Intelligence And
Fs Unit, Pin 904987 C/o 56 Apo At Jodhpur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through Secretary, Dma Ministry Of
Defence, Dhq Po New Delhi-11
2. The Chief Of Army Staff, Ihq Of Mod (Army), Dhq Po New
Delhi- 110011.
3. Intelligence And Fs Group/mi-21, Gs Branch, Ihq Of Mod
(Army) Dhq Po New Delhi- 110011.
4. Records Office, Intelligence Corps, Pin 908793 C/o 56
Apo.
5. 879 Intelligence And FS Unit, Pin 904987 C/o 56 Apo.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmpal Singh Dhaka
For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.P. Bohra, Sr. CGSC assisted by
Ms. Devyanshi Tanvi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
14/05/2026
1. By way of filing the present writ petition, the petitioner has
prayed for the following reliefs:-
“It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed
that by an appropriate writ order or direction your lordship
may kindly be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition
and the order impugned dated 26.06.2025 (Annx-5) issued
by the respondent no. 4 may kindly be quashed and set aside
and the respondents may kindly be directed to cancel and
screen at present location of posting at Jodhpur till
completion of his 9 months remaining service so that he can
regularly appear before the Trial Court from time to time as
and when date is fixed for hearing.
(Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 08:58:49 AM)
(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 01:05:55 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:23191] (2 of 3) [CW-12556/2025]
Any other appropriate writ order or directions which
this Hon'ble court may deem just and proper in the facts and
circumstances of this case may kindly also be passed in favor
of the humble petitioner.”
2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon
perusal of the material available on record, this Court finds that, in
the present writ petition, stay of the impugned posting order
dated 26.06.2025 (Annexure-5), issued by respondent No.4, was
granted by this Court after considering the submissions made on
behalf of the petitioner that he is facing criminal trial for offences
under Sections 147, 148, 341, 307, 332, 353 and 302 of the IPC
as well as Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act before the competent
Criminal Court at Jodhpur and, therefore, his transfer at this
juncture would cause him great hardship as he is required to
attend court proceedings on each and every date of hearing. It
was further submitted before this Court that the petitioner was
due for discharge from service in the year 2026 and, therefore, no
fruitful purpose would be served by transferring him at this stage.
3. Today, when the matter was taken up, learned counsel for
the respondents informed the Court that the petitioner is actually
due for discharge from service on 31.03.2029 and further, under
the applicable rules/policy, his services may further be extended
by two years on the recommendation of the Screening Board. It
was also informed that the petitioner has not submitted any
application seeking voluntary discharge from service till date,
which alone could have made him eligible for discharge during the
present year.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents further informed this
Court that a Coordinate Bench of this Court, in the case of
“Vishana Ram vs. Union of India & Ors.” decided on
(Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 08:58:49 AM)
(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 01:05:55 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:23191] (3 of 3) [CW-12556/2025]
14.07.2025, has held that a person cannot claim any special
advantage regarding posting at a particular place merely because
he is facing a criminal trial.
5. In view of the aforesaid and keeping in mind the law laid
down by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in Vishana Ram
(supra), this Court finds no merit in the present writ petition and
the same is accordingly dismissed as being devoid of merit.
6. The stay application also stands dismissed.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
240-Dinesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.