HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR
FARAS DAN CHARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW / 5277 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:23170]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5277/2026
Faras Dan Charan S/o Shri Laxmi Dan, Aged About 47 Years,
Resident Of Dhelari Tehsil Desuri District Pali Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Medical And Health Department, Government Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Mission Director (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical Health
And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, C-
Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
3. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services,
Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg,
Jaipur.
4. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health
Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan,
Jaipur.
5. The Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
6. The Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
7. The Secretary, General Administration Department,
Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripudaman Singh
For Respondent(s) : --
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
14/05/2026
1. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the
matter has been heard for final disposal at the admission stage
itself.
(Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 08:59:27 AM)
(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 01:20:58 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:23170] (2 of 3) [CW-5277/2026]
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that
the facts in the present case is similar to the facts in D.B. Civil
Writ Petition No. 11737/2024 (Rodu Lal & Ors. Vs. State of
Rajasthan & Ors.), decided on 26.08.2025.
3. The relevant paragraphs of the order dated 26.08.2025
passed in the case of Rodu Lal (Supra) reads as follows:-
“41. In light of the aforesaid facts & findings and the
judgments, this Court is of the opinion that Rule 3 of the Rules
of 2022 has to be read harmoniously, whereby, the petitioners
and similarly situated persons, who have been appointed
through placement agency after issuance of public
advertisement are to be covered under the ambit of Rule 3 of
the Rules of 2022. Since, the above rule has been read
harmoniously in favour of the petitioners, therefore, there is
no requirement to decide question No. (b), which was framed
under para 13. The harmonious reading of the Rule itself
clarifies that, there ought to be no discrimination between the
contractual employees appointed through placement agency
as well as the contractual employees appointed directly.
42. For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petitions are allowed in
the following terms: (i) The respondents shall consider the
individual case of each contractual employee, appointed prior
to enforcement of the Rules of 2022 strictly in accordance with
Rule 3 of the Rules of 2022, meaning thereby, that if an
employee has been appointed on a post created by the
Administrative Department with the concurrence of the
Finance Department and the appointment has been through
issuance of a public advertisement further without there being
any differentiation whether the public advertisement has been
issued by the State Government or by the placement agency.
(ii) If the case of the individual is in conformation with the
Rule 3 of the Rules of 2022, as interpreted above, then the
benefit of the Rules of 2022 shall be extended to such
petitioners.
43. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.”
4. In light of the order cited above, the present writ petition is
disposed of in the same terms as in the case of Rodu Lal & Ors.
(supra). The petitioner shall be at liberty to make a
representation before the concerned authorities within a period of
(Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 08:59:27 AM)
(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 01:20:58 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:23170] (3 of 3) [CW-5277/2026]
15 days. On such representation, the concerned authorities are
directed to dispose of the same in light of the decision passed in
case of Rodu Lal within a period of two months from the date of
receipt of this order.
5. All the pending ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.