SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 15057

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
KRISHAN KUMAR DANGI ALIAS KRISH ALIAS KARESHWAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 2410 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:23437]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2410/2026

Krishan Kumar Dangi Alias Krish Alias Kareshwar S/o Bhagwan

Lal, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Paduni, Police Station

Arnod, District Pratapgarh (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail

Pichyak, District Jodhpur)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Bhadu

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

Order

13/05/2026

1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is

filed by the applicant-accused Krishan Kumar Dangi Alias

Krish Alias Kareshwar S/o Bhagwan Lal, seeking bail in

respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.221/2024

dated 06.07.2024 registered at P.S. Bilara District – Jodhpur

Rural, for the offence under Sections 8/21 of NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant

has been falsely implicated in the matter and the

investigation against him is complete and he is no more

required in investigation. He further submits that there are

no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the

jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the

applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate

with trial, which will take time.

(Uploaded on 16/05/2026 at 09:59:24 AM)

(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 02:10:43 AM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JD:23437] (2 of 5) [CRLMB-2410/2026]

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that no

recovery has been effected from the petitioner. He further

submitted that the present petitioner is arrayed as an

accused only on basis of a confessional statement of Ramesh

Bishnoi. He also submitted that the statement of co-accused

is not admissible under the law against the petitioner. He

further submitted that the present petitioner is arrayed as an

accused only under Section 29 of the NDPS Act. He further

submitted that initially the investigation was kept pending

against the petitioner, but after arrest of the petitioner on

04.02.2026, a supplementary charge sheet has been filed.

4. Learned counsel has further submitted that accused Girdhar

Singh @ Girdhari @ Gidiya @ Gadariya also charged for

offence under Section 29 of the NDPS Act on basis of

statement of co-accused, was granted bail by a Co-ordinate

Bench of this Court on 15.01.2025. He further submitted

that no other criminal case whatsoever nature was

registered against the petitioner.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail

application and submitted that the allegations are grave and

serious in nature. He has also filed a report received from

concerned Police Station.

6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned

Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by

both the parties.

7. On 06.07.2024, SHO PS Bilara, District Jodhpur Rural has

received an information about suspect possessing

contraband article and accordingly he reached at designated

(Uploaded on 16/05/2026 at 09:59:24 AM)

(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 02:10:43 AM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JD:23437] (3 of 5) [CRLMB-2410/2026]

place wherein he detained Ramesh Bishnoi. After serving a

notice, he searched Ramesh Bishnoi and recovered MDMA in

two plastic pouches having weight of 92 gram and 76 gram

respectively. Thus, total 168 gram contraband was

recovered. During interrogation, Ramesh Bishnoi has named

the present petitioner for supplying of MDMA. FIR

No.221/2024 dated 06.07.2024 was registered at P.S. Bilara

District – Jodhpur Rural, for the offence under Sections 8/21

of NDPS Act. The investigation further revealed that MDMA

was supposed to be delivered to Girdhar Singh @ Girdhari @

Gidiya @ Gadariya. Initially, a charge sheet against Ramesh

Bishnoi and Girdhar Singh @ Girdhari @ Gidiya @ Gadariya

was drawn and kept pending against the present petitioner,

but after the arrest of the present petitioner, a

supplementary charge sheet is filed.

8. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has already granted bail to

Girdhar Singh @ Girdhari @ Gidiya @

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top