HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
THAKRIRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 3538 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:22948]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3538/2026
Thakriram S/o Chatraram, Aged About 41 Years, Harni
Amarpura, Police Station-Revdar .dist.- Sirohi Raj. (Accused In
Dist. Jail, Sirohi)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sonu Manawat, PP
Mr. Veer Bajrang Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU
Order
13/05/2026
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
material available on record.
The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.
25/2026 registered at Police Station Rewdar, District Sirohi, for the
offence punishable under Section 103(1) of the BNS. He has
preferred the present bail application under Section 483 of the
BNSS.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in the
present case, the deceased Jivaram died due to cerebral bleed, as
reflected in the post-mortem report. He submits that no injury has
been found on any vital part of the body of the deceased. There is
only one simple injury on the cheek. The cause of death is not
attributed to any external injury. He further submits that, as per
(Uploaded on 14/05/2026 at 04:51:08 PM)
(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 02:12:24 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:22948] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-3538/2026]
the Fard Surtahal lash of the deceased, no injury has been found
on the body of the deceased except one injury on the cheek and
another on the palm. It is contended that the death of the
deceased was natural and not caused by any injury inflicted by the
petitioner.
Learned counsel further submits that even as per the
statements of the witnesses present at the spot, no injury by any
weapon is alleged to have been caused by the petitioner. Learned
counsel has taken the Court through the statement of Bhoota
Ram, who is stated to be an eye-witness to the incident. He
submits that, according to Bhoota Ram, the aggressor was in fact
Jivaram, who attempted to assault the accused, and no specific
injury is alleged to have been caused by the petitioner. It is
further submitted that Gopal Ram, the shopkeeper present at the
site, has also stated that Jivaram was the aggressor; however, he
stated that the petitioner struck Jivaram on the cheek with the
kada worn on his hand when Jivaram attempted to assault him
with a lathi. Apart from this, no weapon is alleged to have been
used.
Learned counsel submits that, even if the prosecution case is
taken at its face value, the offence, at best, would fall under
Section 117 of the BNS , as the injuries are simple in nature. It is
further submitted that the investigation qua the petitioner is
complete and there is nothing on record linking the petitioner with
the death of the deceased. The petitioner is in judicial custody
(Uploaded on 14/05/2026 at 04:51:08 PM)
(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 02:12:24 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:22948] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-3538/2026]
since 18.02.2026. It is also submitted that the conclusion of the
trial is likely to take a considerable amount of time.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned
counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail
application. They submit that the injury caused by the petitioner
resulted in the death of the deceased.
This Court has considered the facts and circumstances of the
case. The FIR reveals that a fight had taken place between
Jivaram and Thakri Ram. Bhoota Ram and other persons stated to
be eye-witnesses have stated that, in fact, Jivaram had attacked
with a lathi. Bhoota Ram does not attribute any aggression or
injury to the petitioner. Gopal Ram states that the petitioner had
struck the deceased on the cheek; however, he also states that
Jivaram had first attacked the petitioner and was shouting at
accused Thakri Ram.
The post-mortem report as well as the Fard Surtahal lash of
the deceased do not reflect any grievous injury on any vital part of
the body. Only simple injuries have been found on the cheek and
palm. The cause of deat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.