HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
MOHANLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 5589 / 2026
##PAGE1##
[2026:RJ-JD:22958]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5589/2026
Mohanlal S/o Shri Girdhari, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of
Pichkarai Tal, Police Station Bhanipura, District Churu Raj.
(Presently District Jail Churu)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharwan Choudhary
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order
13/05/2026
1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is
filed by the applicant-accused Mohanlal S/o Shri Girdhari
seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR
No.41/2026 dated 26.03.2026 registered at Police Station
Bhanipura, District Churu, for the offence under Sections 333,
115(2), 126(2), 326(a), 307 & 324(2) BNS.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant
has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation
against him is complete and he is no more required in
investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of
fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble
Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat
offence and cooperate with trial, which will take time.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is
having a family dispute and due to the family reasons a false case
(Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:30:17 PM)
(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 02:21:28 AM)
##PAGE2##[2026:RJ-JD:22958] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5589/2026]
has been registered against him. He further submits that the
petitioner was arrested on 28.03.2026 and since then he is in
custody. He also submits that some of the cases registered against
him has already been disposed of and petitioner undertake note to
repeat offence.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail
application and submitted that the allegations are grave and
serious in nature. He submitted that petitioner is a habitual
criminal and having 17 criminal cases.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned
Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both
the parties.
6. On basis of a report registered by father of petitioner-
accused about assault on his younger daughter-in-law, a report
has registered at concerned police station Bhanipura and matter is
investigated. The present petitioner was arrested and now he is in
custody.
7. The order of the trial Court indicate that 17 criminal cases
were registered against the petitioner and out of which 4 have
been disposed but remaining are pending. The registration of
criminal cases indicate criminal background of the petitioner.
8. In case of Neeru Yadav vs. State of U.P AIR 2015 SC
3703 and further in case of State of State of Karnataka vs. Sri
Darshan Etc. 2025 INSC 979 Hon’ble Supreme Court has
considered criminal antecedents of accused as an important factor
in consideration of bail. In case of Brijmani Devi v. Pappu
Kumar (2022) 4 SCC 497, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held
that while deciding a bail application, the Court must exercise its
(Uploaded on 15/05/2026 at 02:30:17 PM)
(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 02:21:28 AM)
##PAGE3##[2026:RJ-JD:22958] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5589/2026]
discretion in a judicious manner and provide reasons for its
conclusion. Due consideration must be given to the nature and
gravity of the crime, the criminal antecedents of the accused, and
the severity of the punishment prescribed for the alleged offence,
alongside the risk of witness tampering or the accused
absconding.
9. Here in this case, 17 criminal cases are registered against
the petitioner since 2010 and every year n number of cases of
identical nature are registered. In the instant case, the petitioner
has been charged for serious offences, therefore, considering the
allegations against the petitioner and criminal background, I am of
the considered view that this is not a fit case to enlarge the
petitioner-accused on bail.
10. Accordingly, the application for bail filed under Section 483 of
BNSS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.