SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 15082

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
MADANRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 6119 / 2026



##PAGE1##

[2026:RJ-JD:23433]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6119/2026

Madanram S/o Shri Kaluram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Kankani,

Police Station Luni, District Jodhpur. (Lodged In District Jail Pali)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaikishan Haniya

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lalit Kishore Sen, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN

Order

13/05/2026

1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is

filed by the applicant-accused Madanram S/o Shri

Kaluram, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case

registered as FIR No.89/2026 dated 03.05.2026 registered

at P.S. Rohat District - Pali, for the offence under Sections

8/20 of NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant

has been falsely implicated in the matter and the

investigation against him is complete and he is no more

required in investigation. He further submits that there are

no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the

jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the

applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate

with trial, which will take time.

(Uploaded on 16/05/2026 at 10:00:26 AM)

(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 02:30:17 AM)

##PAGE2##

[2026:RJ-JD:23433] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6119/2026]

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner that mandatory provisions

under the NDPS Act have not been complied before effecting

search and seizure by police. He further submits that no

option to be searched in presence of Magistrate was afforded

to the petitioner. He further submits that the recovered

article was Ganja and the recovered quantity is quite less

than commercial. He also submits that there is no criminal

antecedent against the petitioner.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail

application and submitted that the allegations are grave and

serious in nature.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned

Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by

both the parties.

6. In the evening of 2nd May 2025 and in intervening night of

2-3 May, SHO PS Rohat District Pali has intercepted a

motorcycle number RJ19SV7847 and recovered 6.170 kg of

Ganja. FIR No.89/2026 dated 03.05.2026 was registered at

P.S. Rohat District-Pali. The recovered quantity is less than

commercial. There is no criminal antecedent against the

petitioner.

7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we

have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in

the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time.

The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore,

looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case

and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case,

(Uploaded on 16/05/2026 at 10:00:26 AM)

(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 02:30:17 AM)

##PAGE3##

[2026:RJ-JD:23433] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6119/2026]

the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-

accused.

8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant-

accused Madanram S/o Shri Kaluram, is hereby allowed

and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail

upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two

sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court

with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with

evidence or influence the witness in any manner.

(ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any

criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal

offence punishable under the Law.

(iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of

the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as

and when asked to appear before the Trial Court.

(iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail

granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be

canceled.

9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the

Trial Court through E-mail.

(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J

MR/136

(Uploaded on 16/05/2026 at 10:00:26 AM)

(Downloaded on 19/05/2026 at 02:30:17 AM)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top